Indicate whether sech(x) is invertible for [0, infinity) and explain why

  • Thread starter Thread starter yoohoo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Explain Infinity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The function sech(x) is defined as sech(x) = 2 / (e^x + e^(-x)). To determine its invertibility on the interval [0, infinity), one must analyze its monotonicity by examining its derivative. The derivative, y' = -2(e^x - e^(-x)) / (e^x + e^(-x))^2, indicates that sech(x) is decreasing for x in [0, infinity), confirming that it is not one-to-one and therefore not invertible on this interval.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of hyperbolic functions, specifically sech(x)
  • Knowledge of derivatives and monotonicity
  • Familiarity with the concept of invertibility in functions
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of hyperbolic functions, focusing on their graphs and behaviors
  • Learn about the criteria for function invertibility, including the horizontal line test
  • Explore the implications of monotonic functions in calculus
  • Investigate the inverse functions of other hyperbolic functions, such as sinh(x) and cosh(x)
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on functions and their properties, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts of invertibility and monotonicity in hyperbolic functions.

yoohoo
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Indicate whether sech(x) is invertible for [0, infinity) and explain why.

The Attempt at a Solution



Sooo... I know that:

sech(x) = 2 / ( ex + e-x )​

I know that to get the inverse equation I'd need to swap the y and the x... but I'm trying to show whether it's invertible so I don't know how much that would do me. I think I need to prove that the equation is monotonic, ie the derivative should be > 0 ). Hence, I took the derivative of the equation to be:

y' = - 2 (ex - e-x) / (ex + e-x)2

Is that right? If so, is that enough to answer the question?

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You could show that sech(x) is not 1 to 1.

What are sech(1) and sech(-1) ?
 
But the problem said invertible on [0, infinity) so x= -1 is not relevant.
 
DUH !

Sorry, I missed the [0, infinity) !

It's right there in the title and in the text!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K