Induced EMF in a small square loop of wire at center of an AC Circuit

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the induced EMF in a small square loop of wire within an AC circuit. The user calculated the current using the power supply voltage and resistance but is uncertain about the correctness of their approach. They encountered difficulties in determining the magnetic field (B) for a rectangular loop and sought appropriate equations. Suggestions include using the Biot-Savart law to find the B field at the center of the larger loop and clarifying whether the induced EMF should be expressed as amplitude or RMS average. The conversation emphasizes the need for accurate formulas and understanding the problem's requirements.
bw519
Messages
5
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
A simple circuit that is 0.3m wide and 0.2m tall is driven with an alternating current (AC) power supply and has a 5 ohm resistor. The AC supply applies a 20V amplitude at 60 Hz. What emf amplitude is induced in microvolts in a small 1cm square loop of wire at the center of the circuit? (you can assume the field is constant over the surface of the square)
Relevant Equations
Emf = NBAw
I used the voltage of the power supply and resistance to solve for the current in the larger circuit (20V/5ohms=4 amps). I am not sure if the equation listed above is the correct one I should be using, but I tried it using the following numbers. For omega, I used 2*pi*frequency. N should equal 1. For area I tried the area of the small square (0.01mx0.01m). I had more of an issue solving for B. I found equations for the magnetic field due to a circular loop and due to a long wire, but I had more trouble finding anything for a rectangular loop. Is this even the correct way to be solving this problem? If so, is there an equation for B that I should be using.

I found one video online that was solving for the B at the center of a square loop. I believe the equation was 4*(4*pi*10^-7)*I*sin(theta)/(4*pi*a/2) where a was the length of the sides of the square. I was trying to use that with the rectangular wire by summing two versions of that equation, using 2 as the first coefficient for two sides at a time that were the same length (instead of 4 all the same), different angles and the different lengths for the sides in place of a, but none of those options seemed to work.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bw519 said:
I found one video online that was solving for the B at the center of a square loop. I believe the equation was 4*(4*pi*10^-7)*I*sin(theta)/(4*pi*a/2) where a was the length of the sides of the square. I was trying to use that with the rectangular wire by summing two versions of that equation, using 2 as the first coefficient for two sides at a time that were the same length (instead of 4 all the same), different angles and the different lengths for the sides in place of a, but none of those options seemed to work.
This approach should work. However, it appears that the formula you are trying to use might not be correct. Take a look at https://www.clutchprep.com/physics/practice-problems/144964/a-steady-current-i-is-flowing-through-a-straight-wire-of-finite-length-part-afin.

The question statement is not clear. Do they want the amplitude of the induced emf or the RMS average emf or maybe something else?
 
Last edited:
You can use Biot-Savart to determine the B field at the center of the large loop. Then emf = -dB/dt times area of small loop.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top