I Induced metric in general case

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter gerald V
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induced
gerald V
Messages
66
Reaction score
3
TL;DR Summary
Does the familiar Gauss formula for the embedded metric hold if the embedding space itself is intrinsically curved?
The Gauss formula for the induced metric reads ##g_{\mu \nu} = G_{ab}\frac{\partial X^a \partial X^b}{\partial x^\mu \partial x^\nu}##, where ##G## is the metric of the embedding space, the capital ##X## are positions in the embedding space, the little ##x## are positions inside the embedded manifold and the ##\partial## denote partial differentiation (no notion of covariance present).


I have read some literature on embedding, pullbacks and so on, but they are all quite abstract. My only question is whether the above formula equally holds if the embedding space is not equipped with a Minkowski-like metric (in some number of dimensions), in particular if the embedding space itself is intrinsically curved.

From what I know the answer is yes but I would be grateful for confirmation or correction.


Thank you very much in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes.
 
Hello! There is a simple line in the textbook. If ##S## is a manifold, an injectively immersed submanifold ##M## of ##S## is embedded if and only if ##M## is locally closed in ##S##. Recall the definition. M is locally closed if for each point ##x\in M## there open ##U\subset S## such that ##M\cap U## is closed in ##U##. Embedding to injective immesion is simple. The opposite direction is hard. Suppose I have ##N## as source manifold and ##f:N\rightarrow S## is the injective...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Back
Top