Induced polarization for collision between conducting spheres

AI Thread Summary
Induced polarization occurs in conducting spheres due to the movement of free electrons in response to an external electric field, which alters the charge distribution on their surfaces. This polarization effectively reduces the distance between the centers of charge without changing the net charge, leading to an increase in kinetic energy as the spheres approach each other. The discussion critiques a previous explanation for lacking clarity on the role of the electric field and the ambiguous reference to the "insides" of the spheres. Participants emphasize the importance of accurately describing how electrons move to the sides facing each other, enhancing the understanding of the phenomenon. Overall, the conversation highlights the nuances of explaining induced polarization in conductive materials.
member 731016
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
Please see below
For this part (b) of this problem,
1675050823659.png

The solution is,
1675050872874.png


However, would a better explanation be:

As the spheres are conductors, there will be free electrons within and on the surface of the conductors that will be polarized by the external electric field between the conductor. This will decrease the effective distance between the centers of charge (won't affect net charge of sphere; only where charge is distributed locally within the sphere). Therefore, the spheres will be closer together that ##r_1 + r_2## so more electric potential energy will be converted to kinetic energy.

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In what way do you feel it is better?
What do you mean by electrons being polarised?
 
  • Like
Likes member 731016 and nasu
haruspex said:
In what way do you feel it is better?
What do you mean by electrons being polarised?
Thanks for your reply @haruspex !

I guess their solution sort of implies that the surface becomes polarized due to the electric field between the spheres. While mine, at least tried too, said that surface will become polarized due to the movement of the electrons local to the surface.

Sorry yes I now realize that I said electrons become polarized, I meant the surface. Electrons can't get polarized since they already have a finite charge ##-e## in a uniform sphere.

Many thanks!
 
Callumnc1 said:
their solution sort of implies that the surface becomes polarized due to the electric field between the spheres. While mine, at least tried too, said that surface will become polarized due to the movement of the electrons local to the surface.
Reaaly? Their explanation says nothing about the field and does not use the word "polarised" but does say the electrons move - without saying why.
What I don't like is the reference to the "insides" of the spheres. Too ambiguous. I would have said that on each sphere they move to the side facing the other sphere.
 
  • Like
Likes member 731016
haruspex said:
Reaaly? Their explanation says nothing about the field and does not use the word "polarised" but does say the electrons move - without saying why.
What I don't like is the reference to the "insides" of the spheres. Too ambiguous. I would have said that on each sphere they move to the side facing the other sphere.
Thank you for your reply @haruspex ! I like what you pointed out about the insides of the spheres!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top