Induction motor windings, number of turns per phase and per pole

  • Thread starter Thread starter rulmismo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Poles Windings
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the number of turns per phase in induction motor windings, emphasizing the relationship between phase voltage, frequency, and flux. The formula provided indicates that the flux used should reflect the mean flux across the entire machine, with considerations for different pole configurations. For a two-pole machine, the turns are concentrated in one winding, while for a four-pole machine, the turns can be distributed either in parallel or series to maintain consistent flux loading. The conversation also touches on the implications of using multi-phase motors, particularly in relation to achieving phase differences in single-phase systems. Overall, the thread seeks clarification on these winding principles and their practical applications in motor design.
rulmismo
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I have some question regarding windings on induction motors, if anybody can help.
Reviewing some literature (*), the usual formulae to get the number of turns per phase of a induction motor winding is
  • Eph= RMS phase voltage [V]
  • Nph= number of turns of phase winding
  • f= frequency [Hz]
  • FL="involved" flux (typically set by a limit of Bmean * involved area, being Bmean about 0.7T for a typical machine) [Wb]
  • p=number of pole pairs
  • K= winding factor
Nph= Eph / (4.44 * f * FL * K )

My question is regarding the flux to be used. Most of the books and references I found talk in this equation of a "per pole" flux, but voltage in the formulae is phase voltage (and you can have several poles per phase winding), so my current understanding is:
- if p=1 (2 pole machine), Nph shall be concentrated in one winding, and flux involved is the "mean" of the whole machine
- if p=2,(4 pole machine), flux loading (Bmean) must be the same so I think:
if poles are feed in paralel (is this the usual case?), Npole=Nphase of the p=1 machine, to keep same flux loading.
if poles are feed in series, Npole=Nphase/p, to keep same flux loading (so same total turns, but distributed between the poles.)
- p=3....

I would appreciate any insight or correction, any reference to a worked example of higher pole machine design or windings could also help.

Thanks!

(*) References just in case can help anybody
ref1
ref2
ref3
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Does the 4 pole motor uses single phase power? I am not sure why you would have a 4 pole motor if you have 3 phase power. If it is a single phase motor, the pole windings will have to have different reactance in order to create a phase difference between the two pole pairs. So the windings will depend on how that phase difference is achieved.

AM
 
These are m-phase motor, in the usual case m is three, then phase windings are the same, but displaced 120º. My question is related to how many turns you would use per pole, so to keep flux within saturation limits.

A n-pole motor (with n>2) is used when you want a lower synchronous speed.
 
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
Thread 'Electromagnet magnetic field issue'
Hi Guys We are a bunch a mechanical engineers trying to build a simple electromagnet. Our design is based on a very similar magnet. However, our version is about 10 times less magnetic and we are wondering why. Our coil has exactly same length, same number of layers and turns. What is possibly wrong? PIN and bracket are made of iron and are in electrical contact, exactly like the reference design. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks. edit: even same wire diameter and coil was wounded by a...
Thread 'Beauty of old electrical and measuring things, etc.'
Even as a kid, I saw beauty in old devices. That made me want to understand how they worked. I had lots of old things that I keep and now reviving. Old things need to work to see the beauty. Here's what I've done so far. Two views of the gadgets shelves and my small work space: Here's a close up look at the meters, gauges and other measuring things: This is what I think of as surface-mount electrical components and wiring. The components are very old and shows how...
Back
Top