Inequalities in the real numbers

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around proving inequalities related to Dedekind Cuts, specifically demonstrating that if \( p \in \alpha \) and \( \epsilon > 0 \) satisfies \( 0 < \epsilon < 1 \) and \( \epsilon < \frac{2 - p^2}{2p + 1} \), then \( (p + \epsilon)^2 < 2 \). The participants clarify the steps needed to derive this conclusion, emphasizing the algebraic manipulation of inequalities. The final proof confirms that \( (p + \epsilon) \in \alpha \), thereby validating the properties of Dedekind Cuts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Dedekind Cuts in real analysis
  • Familiarity with inequalities and algebraic manipulation
  • Knowledge of the properties of real numbers
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical notation and logic
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Dedekind Cuts in detail
  • Learn about algebraic proofs involving inequalities
  • Explore the implications of the completeness property of real numbers
  • Investigate other methods of defining real numbers, such as Cauchy sequences
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of real analysis, and anyone interested in the foundational aspects of real numbers and their properties.

mcastillo356
Gold Member
Messages
658
Reaction score
361
TL;DR
It's so a basic question that I feel shame.
I'm still not sure about this solved reasoning that involves inequalities
How do we get ##\epsilon(2p+\epsilon)<\epsilon(2p+1)<2-p^2## from ##0<\epsilon<1## and ##\epsilon<\dfrac{2-p^2}{2p+1}##?

Answer: As we have ##\epsilon<1##, we've got ##2p+\epsilon<2p+1##; therefore, ## \epsilon(2p+\epsilon)<\epsilon(2p+1) ##;
-as we have ##\epsilon<\dfrac{2-p^2}{2p+1}##, we also have ##\epsilon(2p+1)<2-p^2##. Is the red-coloured argue what I don't understand

Greetings, appreciated PF
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If ##\varepsilon < 1## then ##x+\varepsilon < x+1##. Set ##x=2p##. Then ##2p+\varepsilon <2p+1.## Now if ##a<b## then ##a\cdot \varepsilon < b\cdot \varepsilon ## because ##\varepsilon >0##. Now set ##a=2p+\varepsilon ## and ##b=2p+1## to get ##(2p+\varepsilon )\cdot \varepsilon < (2p+1)\cdot \varepsilon ##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mcastillo356
Fantastic, I never imagined it could be explained in so an easy way.
Thanks, fresh_42!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fresh_42
Hi, PF, there is something more about this thread: I want to contextualize the question, and, by the way, ask another two questions. I beg you a pardon if this means to change the thread's place.

It's about Dedekind Cuts, concretely ## \sqrt 2 = \{r\in \mathbb Q\mid r<0\}\cup \{r\in \mathbb Q\mid r\geq 0,\ r^2<2\} ##

And the task is to prove ##\alpha=\sqrt 2## is a cut, without mentioning ##\sqrt 2##

1- As ##1^2<2<2^2##, it satisfies ##1\in\alpha## and ##2\in \mathbb Q\setminus\alpha##; so the first property of Dedekind Cuts is satisfied (for example, the proof that ##\alpha\neq \mathbb Q## is this: ##2\notin \alpha##, because it doesn't satisfy neither ##2<0## nor ## 2\geq 0 ## and ##2^2<2##).

2-If ##p\in\alpha## and ##q<p##, or ##q<0##, in which case ##p\in \alpha##, by definition, or ##0\leq q<p##; hence ##p^2<q^2<2##. Therefore, ##q\in \alpha##.
Why is that ##p^2<q^2<2##?

3- If ##p\in\alpha##, alternatively ##p\leq 0##, in which case ##p<1\in\alpha##, or ##p>0##, in which case ##p^2<2##. Let's see what must require a rational number ##\epsilon>0## so that ##p+\epsilon\in \alpha##:

##(p+\epsilon)^2=p^2+2p\epsilon+\epsilon^2<2##

This is equivalent to ##\epsilon(2p+\epsilon)<2-p^2##. If we take ##0<\epsilon<1## and ##\epsilon<\dfrac{2-p^2}{2p+1}## then
##2(p+\epsilon)<\epsilon(2p+1)<2-p^2##, so ##p<q=p+\epsilon\in \alpha##

Why this implication?

Greetings! Hope not to have treated too badly the english.
 
mcastillo356 said:
3- If ##p\in\alpha##, alternatively ##p\leq 0##, in which case ##p<1\in\alpha##, or ##p>0##, in which case ##p^2<2##. Let's see what must require a rational number ##\epsilon>0## so that ##p+\epsilon\in \alpha##:

##(p+\epsilon)^2=p^2+2p\epsilon+\epsilon^2<2##

This is equivalent to ##\epsilon(2p+\epsilon)<2-p^2##. If we take ##0<\epsilon<1## and ##\epsilon<\dfrac{2-p^2}{2p+1}## then
##2(p+\epsilon)<\epsilon(2p+1)<2-p^2##, so ##p<q=p+\epsilon\in \alpha##

Why this implication?

Greetings! Hope not to have treated too badly the english.
I don't understand the bit in red at the end. You have:

##0<\epsilon<1## and ##\epsilon<\dfrac{2-p^2}{2p+1}##

Now you have to show that, with these bounds on ##\epsilon## we have ##(p + \epsilon)^2 < 2##. I.e. ##p + \epsilon \in \alpha##.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: mcastillo356
Hello, PeroK
The target consists in suppose ##p\in \alpha##, this is, we have ##p## that satisfies ##p<0## or ##p\geq 0## and ##p``^2<2## (not mentioning ##\sqrt 2##), and I must find a ##q>p## that satisfies the same (whithout references to ##\sqrt 2##.
All I find in the proof is a dance of ##\epsilon##, ##p##, 0, 1, and 2.
Let's see, I think I understand:
##2(p+\epsilon)<(p+\epsilon)^2<2##: ##2(p+\epsilon)=q\in \alpha##
 
mcastillo356 said:
Hello, PeroK
The target consists in suppose ##p\in \alpha##, this is, we have ##p## that satisfies ##p<0## or ##p\geq 0## and ##p``^2<2## (not mentioning ##\sqrt 2##), and I must find a ##q>p## that satisfies the same (whithout references to ##\sqrt 2##.
All I find in the proof is a dance of ##\epsilon##, ##p##, 0, 1, and 2.
Let's see, I think I understand:
##2(p+\epsilon)<(p+\epsilon)^2<2##: ##2(p+\epsilon)=q\in \alpha##
I don't understand that at all.

You have to show that:

##0<\epsilon<1## and ##\epsilon<\dfrac{2-p^2}{2p+1} \ \ \Rightarrow \ \ (p + \epsilon)^2 < 2##

That should be quite simple.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: mcastillo356
PS you could check it out for ##p = \frac 7 5##.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: mcastillo356
It works, but, how can I prove it algebraically?
 
  • #10
mcastillo356 said:
It works, but, how can I prove it algebraically?
Using algebra! Starting with ##(p + \epsilon)^2 = p^2 + 2p\epsilon + \epsilon^2##
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: mcastillo356
  • #11
Ok, processing...
 
  • #12
@mcastillo356, I revised your thread title slightly, changing "inequations" to "inequalities," which is what we call them in English. Inconsistent, but that's English for you.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: mcastillo356
  • #13
PeroK said:
You have to show that:

##0<\epsilon<1## and ##\epsilon<\dfrac{2-p^2}{2p+1} \ \ \Rightarrow \ \ (p + \epsilon)^2 < 2##

That should be quite simple.

PeroK said:
Using algebra! Starting with ##(p + \epsilon)^2 = p^2 + 2p\epsilon + \epsilon^2##

I know only to prove this:
Dedekind Cuts, third property:
III If ##p\in\alpha## then ##p<r## for some ##r\in \alpha##
For example, the cut ##\sqrt 2 = \{r\in \mathbb Q\mid r\leq 0\}\cup \{r\in \mathbb Q\mid r> 0,\ r^2<2\}##. If ##p\in\alpha##, alternatively ##p\leq 0##, in which case ##p<1\in\alpha##, or ##p>0##, in which case ##p^2<2##. Let's see what must require a rational number ##\epsilon>0## so that ##p+\epsilon\in \alpha##:

##(p+\epsilon)^2=p^2+2p\epsilon+\epsilon^2<2##

This is equivalent to ##\epsilon(2p+\epsilon)<2-p^2##. If we take ##0<\epsilon<1## and ##\epsilon<\dfrac{2-p^2}{2p+1}## then we've found the proper ##\epsilon##.
Problem solved?

##2(p+\epsilon)<\epsilon(2p+1)<2-p^2## would be another way to express the two inequalities that bound ##\epsilon##
 
  • #14
mcastillo356 said:
If we take ##0<\epsilon<1## and ##\epsilon<\dfrac{2-p^2}{2p+1}## then we've found the proper ##\epsilon##.
Problem solved?
I would still like to see a direct calculation that starts with that ##\epsilon## and shows that ##(p+\epsilon)^2 < 2##.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: mcastillo356
  • #15
I will try. I'll answer tomorrow
 
  • #16
Hello, PeroK, PF
##0<\epsilon<1## and ##\epsilon<\dfrac{2-p^2}{2p+1}\Rightarrow{(p+\epsilon)^2<2}##
##0<\epsilon<\dfrac{2-p^2}{2p+1}##
##\Rightarrow{0<\epsilon(2p+1)<2-p^2}##
##\Rightarrow{p^2<2}##
Dedekind Cuts, third property
##\therefore{(p+\epsilon)^2<2}##
:confused:
?
 
  • #17
mcastillo356 said:
Hello, PeroK, PF
##0<\epsilon<1## and ##\epsilon<\dfrac{2-p^2}{2p+1}\Rightarrow{(p+\epsilon)^2<2}##
##0<\epsilon<\dfrac{2-p^2}{2p+1}##
##\Rightarrow{0<\epsilon(2p+1)<2-p^2}##
##\Rightarrow{p^2<2}##
Dedekind Cuts, third property
##\therefore{(p+\epsilon)^2<2}##
:confused:
?
We already knew that ##p^2 < 2##. It was ##(p+ \epsilon)^2 < 2## that must be shown.

I gave you the first step previously (which you ignored!): $$(p+\epsilon)^2 = p^2 + 2p\epsilon + \epsilon^2 = p^2 + \epsilon(2p + \epsilon)$$ The second step is: $$p^2 + \epsilon(2p + \epsilon) < p^2 + \epsilon(2p + 1) \ \ (\text{as} \ \ \epsilon <1)$$ Just two steps left for you now!
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: mcastillo356
  • #18
Hi, PeroK, PF

$$(p+\epsilon)^2=p^2+2p\epsilon+\epsilon^2=p^2+\epsilon(2p+\epsilon)$$

$$\epsilon<1\Rightarrow p^2+\epsilon(2p+\epsilon)<p^2+\epsilon(2p+1)$$

$$\epsilon<\dfrac{2-p^2}{2p+1}\Rightarrow \epsilon(2p+1)<2-p^2$$

$$p^2+\epsilon(2p+\epsilon)<p^2+\epsilon(2p+1)<2-p^2+p^2$$

$$\Rightarrow (p+\epsilon)^2<2\Rightarrow (p+\epsilon)\in \alpha$$

? :confused:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
  • #19
:partytime:
 
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: mcastillo356

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
742
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K