MHB Inequality challenge for positive real numbers

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving the inequality 2(√2 - 1)a² - b² < 1 under the condition that a and b are positive real numbers satisfying a³ + b³ = a - b. Participants agree that equality will never hold in this scenario. There is a consensus that the original problem statement needed correction to reflect that it should not imply a tight inequality. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately framing mathematical problems. Overall, the focus is on establishing the inequality while clarifying the conditions under which it holds.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
If $a$ and $b$ are two positive real, and that $a^3+b^3=a-b$, prove that $2\left(\sqrt{2}-1\right)a^2-b^2\lt 1$.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
If $a$ and $b$ are two positive real, and that $a^3+b^3=a-b$, prove that $2\left(\sqrt{2}-1\right)a^2-b^2\le 1$.
it should be:If $a$ and $b$ are two positive real, and that $a^3+b^3=a-b$, prove that $2\left(\sqrt{2}-1\right)a^2-b^2<1$.
equality will never hold
 
anemone said:
If $a$ and $b$ are two positive real, and that $a^3+b^3=a-b$, prove that $2\left(\sqrt{2}-1\right)a^2-b^2\le 1$.
$a^3+b^3=a-b>0 \,\,\therefore a>b$,
$a-a^3=b+b^3>0,\therefore a<1$
we have:$0<b<a<1$
and $2\left(\sqrt{2}-1\right)a^2-b^2<2(1.5-1)\times 1^2-0^2=1$
equality will never hold
 
Ah, Albert, you're absolutely right, the problem itself should not be a tight inequality. I will fix it now, and thanks for catching it!
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top