Infinite number of polarisers (Malus's law)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Raphisonfire
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Infinite Law
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the maximum intensity of light transmitted through a series of polarizers using Malus's Law. The initial intensity of unpolarized light is 1000 W.m-2, and the first and last polarizers are oriented at 0° and 90°, respectively. The key insight is that the angles of the intermediate polarizers should be evenly spaced to maximize transmission, with the intensity after the first polarizer being I0/2. The final expression for intensity with n intermediate polarizers is I = (1/2)I0cos4(θ) where θ is the angle of the intermediate polarizers.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Malus's Law for polarizers
  • Basic knowledge of trigonometric functions and their applications
  • Familiarity with the concept of intensity in wave physics
  • Ability to manipulate mathematical expressions involving angles
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical derivation of Malus's Law in detail
  • Explore the effects of varying angles between multiple polarizers
  • Learn about the practical applications of polarizers in optics
  • Investigate the behavior of light intensity in complex optical systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, optical engineers, and anyone interested in the principles of light polarization and its applications in technology.

Raphisonfire
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
My problem:
"Imagine you have two identical perfect linear polarisers and a source of natural light. Place them one behind the other and position their transmission axes at 0° and 90° respectively. If 1000 W.m-2 of randomly polarised light is incident.

Determine an expression for the maximum possible intensity of light that can be transmitted through if you insert ‘n’ polarisers between them."

I understand that I need to be using, Malus's law which is...
[tex]I_θ = I_0 Cos(θ_n)^2[/tex]

My attempt:

I know that the first and last polariser transmission axes must be at 0° and 90°, I know how to write the expression out... eg. [tex]I_θ = I_0 Cos(θ_1)^2 Cos(θ_2)^2... Cos(θ_∞)^2[/tex] But I am just not sure how to generalize the expression.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Raphisonfire said:
My problem:
"Imagine you have two identical perfect linear polarisers and a source of natural light. Place them one behind the other and position their transmission axes at 0° and 90° respectively. If 1000 W.m-2 of randomly polarised light is incident.

Determine an expression for the maximum possible intensity of light that can be transmitted through if you insert ‘n’ polarisers between them."

I understand that I need to be using, Malus's law which is...
[tex]I_θ = I_0 Cos(θ_n)^2[/tex]

My attempt:

I know that the first and last polariser transmission axes must be at 0° and 90°, I know how to write the expression out... eg. [tex]I_θ = I_0 Cos(θ_1)^2 Cos(θ_2)^2... Cos(θ_∞)^2[/tex] But I am just not sure how to generalize the expression.
I'll try to get you started.

I don't think the problem is actually asking about an infinite number of polarizers. It's just asking for n polarizers (plus the two given polarizers on each end), where n is some arbitrary natural number (and can be finite).

Here are some hints that I promised to get you started.
  • The light's intensity after the first polarizer is [itex]\frac{1}{2}I_0[/itex], where [itex]I_0[/itex] is the original intensity. That's because the original light is unpolarized.
  • Now let's start adding polarizers in between the two given ones. The problem statement said that the transmission axes should be such that the maximum possible intensity gets through the system. That means that you need to adjust the transmission axes of the polarizers in the middle such that the total of 90o of rotation is divided up evenly between them. In other words, if you add 1 polarizer, its angle should be 45o. If you add two polarizers, the angles should be at 30o and 60o, and so on.
  • Let's start with 1 polarizer (n = 1). Remember, the intensity after the first polarizer is [itex]\frac{1}{2}I_0[/itex]. That intensity is then reduced by a factor of [itex]\cos^2(45^{\circ})[/itex] by the middle polarizer. Finally, the intensity is reduced by another factor of [itex]\cos^2(90^{\circ} - 45^{\circ}) = \cos^2(45^{\circ})[/itex] by the last polarizer. So the final intensity in this case is [itex]I = \frac{1}{2}I_0\cos^2(45^{\circ})\cos^2(45^{\circ}) = \frac{1}{2}I_0 \cos^4(45^{\circ})[/itex]

Now try it with n = 2. Then n = 3. Do you see a pattern forming?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K