Infinite Series .... Sohrab Exercise 2.3.10 (1) .... ....

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on Exercise 2.3.10 (1) from Houshang H. Sohrab's "Basic Real Analysis" (Second Edition), which involves proving the convergence of an infinite series. The user, Peter, presents a formal proof demonstrating that if the series $$\sum_{n=1}^\infty x_n$$ is convergent, then it satisfies the Cauchy criterion. Peter's proof correctly establishes that adding or subtracting a finite number of terms from a convergent series maintains convergence, and he seeks feedback on the rigor of his argument. The community acknowledges the clarity and correctness of Peter's proof.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of infinite series and convergence criteria
  • Familiarity with Cauchy sequences and their properties
  • Knowledge of limits and their application in real analysis
  • Basic mathematical proof techniques and rigor
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Cauchy Criterion for convergence in more detail
  • Explore the properties of convergent series in real analysis
  • Review the concept of absolute convergence and its implications
  • Learn about the implications of rearranging terms in convergent series
USEFUL FOR

Students of real analysis, mathematicians focusing on series convergence, and educators teaching mathematical proof techniques will benefit from this discussion.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Houshang H. Sohrab's book: "Basic Real Analysis" (Second Edition).

I am focused on Chapter 2: Sequences and Series of Real Numbers ... ...

I need help In order to formulate a rigorous proof to the proposition stated in Exercise 2.3.10 (1) ... ...

Exercise 2.3.10 (1) reads as follows:
View attachment 9062I am unsure of what would constitute a formal and rigorous proof to the proposition or statement of Exercise 2.3.10 (1) ...

Here is my attempt at a formal and rigorous proof ...Assume $$\sum_{ n = 1 }^{ \infty } x_n $$ is convergent ... then $$\sum_{ n = 1 }^{ \infty } x_n $$ is Cauchy ...Thus we have the following ...... for every $$\epsilon \gt 0 \ \exists \ N \text{ such that } m_0 \geq n_0 \geq N \ \Longrightarrow \ \vert s_{ m_0 } - s_{ n_0 } \vert \lt \epsilon$$ ... ...... that is ... for every $$\epsilon \gt 0 \ \exists \ N \text{ such that } m_0 \geq n_0 \geq N \ \Longrightarrow \ \left\vert \sum_{ k = n_0 + 1 }^{ m_0 } x_n \right \vert \lt \epsilon$$ ... ...If $$n_0 \geq m$$ then we are done ...If $$n_0 \lt m_0$$ ... then take $$n_0 = m$$ and we are done ...Now assume $$\sum_{ n = m }^{ \infty } x_n $$ is convergent ... ... then ... for every $$\epsilon \gt 0 \ \exists \ N \text{ such that } m_0 \geq n_0 \geq m \geq N \ \Longrightarrow \ \left\vert \sum_{ k = n_0 + 1 }^{ m_0 } x_n \right \vert \lt \epsilon$$ ... ...Clearly the above N ensures that for $$\sum_{ n = 1 }^{ \infty } x_n $$ ...

... $$\epsilon \gt 0 \ \exists \ N \text{ such that } m_0 \geq n_0 \geq N \ \Longrightarrow \ \left\vert \sum_{ k = n_0 + 1 }^{ m_0 } x_n \right \vert \lt \epsilon$$ ... ...

... that is $$\sum_{ n = 1 }^{ \infty }x_n $$ is convergent ...

Could someone please indicate whether the above proof is correct and acceptable ,,, indeed ... have I missed the point ...

Further could someone critique the above proof pointing out errors and deficiencies ...Help will be appreciated ...

Peter
 

Attachments

  • Sohrab - Exercise 2.3.10 ... .png
    Sohrab - Exercise 2.3.10 ... .png
    15.4 KB · Views: 158
Physics news on Phys.org
$\displaystyle\sum_{n=1}^\infty x_n$ is convergent​

$\displaystyle\iff\ \lim_{k\to\infty}\sum_{n=1}^k x_n$ exists and is finite

$\displaystyle\iff\ \lim_{k\to\infty}\sum_{n=m}^k x_n$ $=$ $\displaystyle\lim_{k\to\infty}\left[\left(\sum_{n=1}^k x_n\right)-\sum_{n=1}^{m-1}x_n\right]$ $=$ $\displaystyle\left[\lim_{k\to\infty}\left(\sum_{n=1}^k x_n\right)\right]-\sum_{n=1}^{m-1}x_n$ exists and is finite

$\displaystyle\iff\ \sum_{n=m}^\infty x_n$ is convergent.

In other words, adding a finite number of terms to or subtracting a finite number of terms from a convergent series results in convergent series.
 
Olinguito said:
$\displaystyle\sum_{n=1}^\infty x_n$ is convergent​

$\displaystyle\iff\ \lim_{k\to\infty}\sum_{n=1}^k x_n$ exists and is finite

$\displaystyle\iff\ \lim_{k\to\infty}\sum_{n=m}^k x_n$ $=$ $\displaystyle\lim_{k\to\infty}\left[\left(\sum_{n=1}^k x_n\right)-\sum_{n=1}^{m-1}x_n\right]$ $=$ $\displaystyle\left[\lim_{k\to\infty}\left(\sum_{n=1}^k x_n\right)\right]-\sum_{n=1}^{m-1}x_n$ exists and is finite

$\displaystyle\iff\ \sum_{n=m}^\infty x_n$ is convergent.

In other words, adding a finite number of terms to or subtracting a finite number of terms from a convergent series results in convergent series.
Thanks for the help Olinguito ... neat clear proof!

Peter
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K