Infinite Square Well with an Adiabatic Evolution

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the geometric phase for the adiabatic widening of the infinite square well, as defined by Griffiths. The geometric phase is expressed as \gamma=i* \int^{w2}_{w1}<\psi_{n}|\frac{d\psi_{n}}{dR}>dR, where R represents the width of the well. The user initially struggles with the integration process and the requirement for the result to be purely imaginary. Ultimately, they resolve the issue by recognizing a missing factor of x in their integration, leading to the conclusion that the geometric phase \gamma is zero.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics concepts, specifically the infinite square well model.
  • Familiarity with the geometric phase and its mathematical formulation.
  • Proficiency in calculus, particularly integration and differentiation of wave functions.
  • Basic knowledge of LaTeX for mathematical expressions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the geometric phase in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the implications of adiabatic processes in quantum systems.
  • Learn about the normalization of wave functions in quantum mechanics.
  • Investigate the role of complex numbers in quantum phase calculations.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, particularly those studying wave functions and geometric phases in adiabatic processes.

Ateowa
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm trying to find the geometric phase for the adiabatic widening of the infinite square well. Griffiths defines the geometric phase to be:
\gamma=i* \int^{w2}_{w1}&lt;\psi_{n}|\frac{d\psi_{n}}{dR}&gt;dR

Where R is the aspect of the potential that is changing and w1, w2 are the initial and final widths of the well, respectively.

Homework Equations



The wave function of the infinite square well is \frac{d\psi_{n}}{dR}=\sqrt{ \frac{1}{2R^{3}}}Sin[\frac{n \pi x}{R}], sharing the notation above where R is the width of the well.

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm having a bit of trouble with using Latex, so I'll try to describe the process that I'm doing. I think that will suffice for my question, but at the bottom I'll include my LaTex attempt.

When I differentiate the wave function with respect to R (The width of the well), I get a sum of a Sine and Cosine function up to constants. But to find the geometric phase, I integrate over the complex conjugate of the wavefunction times the derivative. This would be fine, but the result of this needs to be purely imaginary, as the integral has a factor of i in front and the phase factor as a whole must be real.

I know I must be missing something. I tried taking the derivative with respect to the wave function multiplied by the dynamic phase in the "complete" wave function, but that doesn't really solve the problem. at best, differentiating with the phase included gives a complex answer-- None of it can be real. Otherwise, the resultant wave function won't be properly normalized and will change magnitude as a result of the adiabatic expansion, which is opposite to the entire rationale behind the method.

\frac{d\psi_n}{dR}=\sqrt{\frac{2}{R}}(\frac{n \pi x}{R})Cos[\frac{n \pi x}{R}]+\sqrt{\frac{1}{2R^{3}}}Sin[\frac{n \pi x}{R}]

But then:

&lt;\psi_n|\frac{d\psi_n}{dR}&gt;=\frac{1}{R}\int\frac{2n\pi}{R^2}Cos[\frac{n \pi x}{R}]Sin[\frac{n \pi x}{R}]-Sin^{2}[\frac{n \pi x}{R}dR=\frac{1}{2R}

Which leads to \gamma=\frac{i}{2}*ln[\frac{w2}{w1}]

This isn't a valid result, as this leads the wave function to be (neglecting the dynamic phase factor for ease of LaTex expression):

\Psi_n(t,x)=e^{\frac{-1}{2}ln[\frac{w2}{w1}]}\psi_n(x)=-\sqrt{\frac{w2}{w1}}\psi_n(x)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I solved my own problem. For anyone who's interested, I missed a factor of x in my integration, so that the dot product should actually be

&lt;\psi_n|\frac{d\psi_n}{dR}&gt;=\frac{1}{R}\int\frac{2n\pi x}{R^2}Cos[\frac{n \pi x}{R}]Sin[\frac{n \pi x}{R}]-Sin^{2}[\frac{n \pi x}{R}]dR=0

Therefore, gamma is zero and everything is okay.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
3K