Infinitesimal SUSY transformation of SYM lagrangian

  • Thread starter karlzr
  • Start date
  • #1
131
2
I tried to verify that the SYM lagrangian is invariant under SUSY transformation, but it turned out there is a term that doesn't vanish.
The SYM lagrangian is:
[tex]\mathscr{L}_{SYM}=-\frac{1}{4}F^{a\mu\nu}F^a_{\mu\nu}+i\lambda^{\dagger a}\bar{\sigma}^\mu D_\mu \lambda^a+\frac{1}{2}D^a D^a[/tex]
the infinitesimal SUSY transformations of the gauge multiplet are:
[tex]\delta A^a_\mu =-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\epsilon^\dagger \bar{\sigma}_\mu \lambda^a+\lambda^{\dagger a} \bar{\sigma}_\mu \epsilon)=-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\epsilon^\dagger \bar{\sigma}_\mu \lambda^a+h.c.[/tex]
[tex]\delta\lambda^a_\alpha =-\frac{i}{2\sqrt{2}}(\sigma^\mu \bar{\sigma}^\nu\epsilon)_\alpha F^a_{\mu\nu}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\epsilon_\alpha D^a[/tex]
[tex]\delta \lambda^{\dagger a}_{\dot{\alpha}} =\frac{i}{2\sqrt{2}}(\epsilon^\dagger \bar{\sigma}^\nu\sigma^\mu)_{\dot{\alpha}} F^a_{\mu\nu}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\epsilon^\dagger_{\dot{\alpha}} D^a[/tex]
[tex]\delta D^a =\frac{-i}{\sqrt{2}}(\epsilon^\dagger \bar{\sigma}^\mu D_\mu \lambda^a-D_\mu \lambda^{\dagger a}\bar{\sigma}^\mu \epsilon)=\frac{-i}{\sqrt{2}}\epsilon^\dagger \bar{\sigma}^\mu D_\mu \lambda^a+h.c.[/tex]
I derived that
[tex]\delta F^a_{\mu\nu}= -\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\epsilon^\dagger(\bar{\sigma}_\nu D_\mu-\bar{\sigma}_\mu D_\nu)\lambda^a+h.c.[/tex]
Then when I calculated the variation of the total lagrangian, I obtained that the [itex]D^a[/itex] and [itex]F^a_{\mu\nu}[/itex] terms cancel out separately. But there is a term from the variation of [itex]A^b_\mu[/itex] in the definition of covariant derivative in [itex]D_\mu \lambda^a[/itex] that remains after all the other cancellation. It looks like
[tex]i g f^{abc}\lambda^{\dagger a}\bar{\sigma}^\nu \lambda^c (\epsilon^\dagger \bar{\sigma}_\nu \lambda^b+h.c.)[/tex]
This is the only term with three [itex]\lambda[/itex]s. So it seems there is no term to cancel this one. I have checked my calculation over and over again but couldn't find the mistake. So any idea what 's wrong?
Thanks a lot,
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person

Answers and Replies

  • #2
22
1
Does the extra term vanish on the equations of motion?
 
  • #3
131
2
Does the extra term vanish on the equations of motion?
That term is proportional to the current of the gaugino. But since all [itex]D_\mu F^{a\mu\nu}[/itex] terms have already been canceled, this current term doesn't vanish by itself.
 
  • #4
131
2
Does the extra term vanish on the equations of motion?
Actually I do have this question. Is it ok if the infinitesimal transformation of lagrangian vanishes only after we apply the equations of motion to it? since I don't think so. I expect it vanishes off-shell.
 
  • #5
22
1
Lagrangian should be invariant off-shell, you are right.

I am not an expert in this. But probably you need to introduce new field with purely algebraic equations of motion, like F in WZ model, just to cancel this term.
 
  • #6
131
2
Lagrangian should be invariant off-shell, you are right.

I am not an expert in this. But probably you need to introduce new field with purely algebraic equations of motion, like F in WZ model, just to cancel this term.
I think the [itex]D^a[/itex] is introduced to do the same thing as [itex]F[/itex] in WZ model. But this [itex]D^a[/itex] doesn't solve this problem. Many textbooks I know discussed the infinitesimal SUSY transformation of WZ lagrangian but not this SYM lagrangian.
Thanks though.
I guess I will check my calculation again. I couldn't think of a way to cancel the term containing three [itex]\lambda[/itex]s.
 
  • #7
131
2
I think I know what's going on there. The remaining term vanishes by itself by using Fierz identity.
 
Last edited:
  • #8
192
6
I think the answer to your question is related to the normed division algebras [tex] tri(\lambda)[/tex] law. It is also the reason SYM only takes place in dimensions 3,4,6,10 same with super strings and why there only superbranes in 4 different dimensions due to the fact there are only 4 normed division algebras. Check out this paper.
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/sym.pdf
 

Related Threads on Infinitesimal SUSY transformation of SYM lagrangian

Replies
19
Views
21K
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Top