Infintite plane of charge guass law

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kiwileaf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Law Plane
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the application of Gauss's Law to derive the electric field due to an infinite plane of charge with uniform surface charge density σ. The key point is that when calculating the charge enclosed within a Gaussian cylinder, only the area of the end caps is considered, leading to the formula q=σA. This is because the sides of the cylinder do not contribute to the electric flux, as their normal vectors are perpendicular to the electric field, resulting in zero flux through those surfaces. The participants clarify that the charge enclosed is determined by the intersection area with the plane, not the entire volume of the cylinder.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss's Law
  • Familiarity with electric fields and charge distributions
  • Knowledge of surface charge density (σ)
  • Basic calculus for integrating electric fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric fields using Gauss's Law in different geometries
  • Learn about the concept of electric flux and its relation to Gaussian surfaces
  • Explore the implications of uniform charge distributions on electric fields
  • Investigate the behavior of electric fields in conductive versus non-conductive materials
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone studying electromagnetism, particularly those interested in electric fields and charge distributions.

kiwileaf
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
when deriving the electric field through using gauss's law, I do not completely understand why when
calculating for the charge enclosed the answer key says
"The surface charge distribution on is uniform. The area of the intersection of he non-conducting plane with the Gaussian cylinder is equal to the area of the end-caps, . Therefore the charge enclosed in the cylinder is q=σA"

I thought that the total charge would be the integral of sigma with respect to the volume of a cylinder (dv), which would make the total charge enclosed q=σV

However, even if it is q=σA I do not understand why we would not include the entire area of the cylinder because wouldn't the charge be over that entire Gaussian surface? why do we disregard the sides and only include the end caps for area?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(this is for an infinite plane of charge with a uniformly distributed positive charge density σ) and using Gaussian surface of a cylinder where the infinite plan is at x=0 and the two sides of the cylnider extend to include x<0 and x>0
 
We disregard the area of the sides because the normal vectors to the sides (, i.e. the curved part) is perpendicular to the electric field vector... It means no flux passes through the curved part of the cylinder.
 
Aniruddha@94 said:
We disregard the area of the sides because the normal vectors to the sides (, i.e. the curved part) is perpendicular to the electric field vector... It means no flux passes through the curved part of the cylinder.
I understand that when computing the integral of E dot dA the E dot dA of the sides would be zero, but I was talking about simply calculating and integrating the amount of charge enclosed (but I think I understand that the charge enclosed would be the σ times the area of the circle of the cylinder that intersects the plane not a three dimensional volume where the sides are included)
 
So that clears it out for you?
 
kiwileaf said:
I understand that when computing the integral of E dot dA the E dot dA of the sides would be zero, but I was talking about simply calculating and integrating the amount of charge enclosed (but I think I understand that the charge enclosed would be the σ times the area of the circle of the cylinder that intersects the plane not a three dimensional volume where the sides are included)
Yes, you've got it. We take ( sigma)X(end area) because that's the only part of the sheet inside the cylinder.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
503
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 83 ·
3
Replies
83
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
946
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K