Why Is the Unit Load Not Considered When Moved to B in Truss Analysis?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fonseh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Line Trusses
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the treatment of unit loads in truss analysis, specifically when a unit load is moved to point B. Participants clarify that the unit load at point C is included in the system's equilibrium equations, while its effect at point B is not directly considered in the same manner. The confusion arises from the interpretation of vertical force equations, where the author simplifies the equation to 0.25 - FBG sin45 = 0, effectively ignoring the unit load and horizontal forces. This simplification is a common practice in structural analysis to maintain equilibrium without explicitly including every load in the calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of truss analysis principles
  • Familiarity with equilibrium equations in structural mechanics
  • Knowledge of vector components in force analysis
  • Basic concepts of static loading conditions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of static equilibrium in truss systems
  • Learn about the method of joints in truss analysis
  • Explore the implications of moving loads in structural analysis
  • Review examples of simplified force equations in engineering mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students of civil engineering, structural engineers, and anyone involved in truss design and analysis will benefit from this discussion.

fonseh
Messages
521
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Pls refer to the second photo , the red line part ...I don't understand the meaning of when 1 unit load move at C , the unit load is inclusive in the right system... I can understand the FBG sin45 + 1 = RE

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


When the in unit load move at b , shouldn't the equation become like this ? FBG sin45 + 1 = RE

Why the author didn't consider the unit load when the unit load is moved to B ?
 

Attachments

  • 551.jpg
    551.jpg
    31.5 KB · Views: 381
  • 552.jpg
    552.jpg
    25.5 KB · Views: 402
  • 553.jpg
    553.jpg
    32.4 KB · Views: 396
Physics news on Phys.org
When 1 unit load moved to B , the equation of vertical forces should be like this , right ? 1-FBGsin45 - FBH = 0.25 , i don't understand why the author used 0.25-FGBsin45 = 0 , by dosing so , he ignored the unit load and also the FBH... How can it be correct ?
 
BUMP
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K