Inner Product of 0 vector, & Complex numbers

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of the inner product in vector spaces over complex numbers, specifically addressing the case of the inner product of the null vector with itself and the implications of using complex conjugates.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why the inner product of a null vector with itself can be non-zero when complex numbers are involved and suggests that using the complex conjugate resolves this issue.
  • Another participant asserts that the inner product of the null vector with itself is zero and that a non-null vector cannot have an inner product of zero, citing axioms related to inner products.
  • A participant explains that the inner product in complex vector spaces must satisfy specific properties, including the use of complex conjugates, and provides an example using ordered pairs of complex numbers to illustrate that the inner product is zero only if both components are zero.
  • A similar explanation is repeated by another participant, reinforcing the importance of complex conjugation in the inner product calculation and noting that using the inner product for real numbers incorrectly could lead to erroneous conclusions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is disagreement regarding the initial question about the inner product of the null vector. While one participant suggests it can be non-zero under certain conditions, others maintain that it must be zero, leading to an unresolved discussion on this point.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the dependence on the definitions of inner products in complex vector spaces and the necessity of complex conjugation, but does not resolve the initial query regarding the null vector.

DeepSeeded
Messages
113
Reaction score
1
Hello,

Can someone help me understand why the Inner Product of a Null vector with itself can be non zero if complex numbers are involved?

And why using the complex conjugate resolved this?

I may have understood this wrong. It could be that an Inner Product of any non-Null vector with itself can be zero if complex numbers are involved. Either way does someone have an example?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It cannot. The inner product of the null vector with itself is zero, and the inner product of a non-null vector cannot be zero. Both these facts follow from the following axiom for inner products:
[tex]\langle v|v \rangle \geq 0[/tex], and [tex]\langle v|v \rangle = 0[/tex] if and only if [tex]v = |0\rangle[/tex]​
 
The inner product on a vector space over the complex numbers must satisfy
[tex]<u, v>= \overline{<v, u>}[/tex] and, in particular, [itex]<u, av>= \overline{a}<u, v>[/itex] for any scalar a.

For C2, ordered pairs of complex numbers, the inner product [itex]<(a+ bi),(a+ bi)> = (a+ bi)\overline(a+ bi)= (a+bi)(a-bi)= a^2+ b^2[/itex] which is 0 only if a= b= 0.

If you mistakenly use the inner product for real numbers, that is, without the "complex conjugation" you could have [itex]<a+ bi, a+ bi>= a^- b^2[/itex] which can be 0. But, as I said, that is a mistake.
 
HallsofIvy said:
The inner product on a vector space over the complex numbers must satisfy
[tex]<u, v>= \overline{<v, u>}[/tex] and, in particular, [itex]<u, av>= \overline{a}<u, v>[/itex] for any scalar a.

For C2, ordered pairs of complex numbers, the inner product [itex]<(a+ bi),(a+ bi)> = (a+ bi)\overline(a+ bi)= (a+bi)(a-bi)= a^2+ b^2[/itex] which is 0 only if a= b= 0.

If you mistakenly use the inner product for real numbers, that is, without the "complex conjugation" you could have [itex]<a+ bi, a+ bi>= a^- b^2[/itex] which can be 0. But, as I said, that is a mistake.

Ahha! Thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K