Integrability implies continuity at a point

Click For Summary
If a function f is integrable on the interval [a,b], it can be proven that there are infinitely many points in that interval where f is continuous. The discussion references two criteria for integrability, with the second criterion being more straightforward for the proof. The user has made some progress by establishing that proving continuity at one point implies continuity at infinitely many points. They express difficulty in solving the problem independently and have resorted to checking the book's solution for earlier parts of the exercise. Additionally, there is a side discussion about the strengths and weaknesses of Hubbard's Vector Calculus, Linear Algebra, and Differentiable Forms.
AlwaysCurious
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If f is integrable on [a,b], prove that there exists an infinite number of points in [a,b] such that f is continuous at those points.

Homework Equations



I'm using Spivak's Calculus. There are two criteria for integrability that could be used in this proof (obviously, they have been shown to be equivalent). The first is the usual inf(upper sums) = sup(lower sums) one, and the second is that for every epsilon greater than zero, there is a partition P such that the upper sum over P minus the lower sum over P is less than epsilon.


The Attempt at a Solution



I haven't made much progress - obviously the second definition seems a bit easier to use, and I have figured out that if you prove that if it is continuous at one point in the interval, it is continuous at an infinite number of points on the interval. So the problem is reduced somewhat.

Any hints?

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is part (e) of the exercise in Spivak. Did you already show (a)-(d)?? Where are you stuck exactly??
 
Yeah, I didn't want to do those parts/look at them because I knew that he was spelling out the solution - so I attempted to all do it in my head, away from the book paper but wasn't able to get anywhere.

I eventually just looked at the book's solution (parts a through d).

As a side note, what do you think of Hubbard's Vector Calculus, Linear Algebra, and Differentiable Forms? You recommended it a while ago. What are its strengths, what are its weaknesses? How does it compare to other good books on similar subjects?

Thank you so much!
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K