Integral 1/x^(2/3)dx from -1 to 1: Solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter miglo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrals
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The integral of 1/x^(2/3) from -1 to 1 is evaluated by splitting it into two improper integrals, one from -1 to b and the other from c to 1, as b and c approach 0. The antiderivative is correctly identified as 3x^(1/3), but the evaluation leads to confusion regarding the cube root of -1, which is not complex. The correct approach recognizes that 1/x^(2/3) is an even function, allowing the integral over (0,1] to be doubled, yielding the correct answer of 6. Additionally, for the improper integral of 2dx/(x^2-1) from -infinity to -2, it is unnecessary to break the integral at -1, as it does not fall within the limits of integration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of improper integrals
  • Knowledge of antiderivatives and integration techniques
  • Familiarity with even and odd functions
  • Experience with limits in calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of even and odd functions in calculus
  • Learn about improper integrals and their evaluation techniques
  • Explore the use of Wolfram Alpha for verifying integral solutions
  • Investigate the concept of limits and their application in integration
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on integration techniques and improper integrals, as well as educators looking for clarification on common misconceptions in evaluating integrals.

miglo
Messages
97
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


integral 1/x^(2/3)dx from -1 to 1


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


so i split it up into two integrals, one with limits going from -1 to b and the other with limits going from c to 1, and taking the limits as b and c go to 0
i know my antiderivative is 3x^(1/3) and i plugged in my limits of integration and then took the limit as both b and c went to 0 and i got an answer of 3-3(-1)^(1/3) i know this is wrong simply because the cube root of -1 will be give me a complex number but i tried it on wolfram alpha and it gave me the same answer. i looked at the back of my book and it says the answer is 6, i don't understand how the book got an answer of 6
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wolfram Alpha is wrong and so is plugging into the antiderivative (which it's likely WA did) for an improper integral. 1/x^(2/3) is actually an even function if you take it to be (1/x^(1/3))^2, isn't it? That should mean you can take the improper integral over (0,1] and double it. What's that integral? BTW (-1)^(1/3) is not necessarily a complex number.
 
Last edited:
ohh thanks! ill watch out for even and odd functions

one more quick question though
i have another improper integral, its 2dx/(x^2-1) from -infinity to -2
so i broke it up into two integrals, the first one has limits from a to -1 with the limit as a approaches -infinity and the second is from -1 to -2
am i doing this right?
 
miglo said:
ohh thanks! ill watch out for even and odd functions

one more quick question though
i have another improper integral, its 2dx/(x^2-1) from -infinity to -2
so i broke it up into two integrals, the first one has limits from a to -1 with the limit as a approaches -infinity and the second is from -1 to -2
am i doing this right?

Why do you need the integral from -1 to -2? -1 isn't in (-infinity,-2). There's no need to break it there. Just integrate from a to -2.
 
ohh alright
thanks again
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
15K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K