Integral Calculus - Spot the Error

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The integral $$\int_1^{\infty}\frac{1}{x} \, dx$$ does not converge, as demonstrated by the antiderivative $$\ln|x|\big|_{1}^{\infty} = \ln(\infty) - \ln(1) = \infty$$. The discussion emphasizes that the comparison test for integrals requires valid comparisons, specifically that both functions being compared must be either positive or negative. The error highlighted is the misuse of the comparison test with functions that do not adhere to this rule, such as comparing negative and positive functions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integral calculus concepts, particularly improper integrals.
  • Familiarity with the comparison test for convergence of integrals.
  • Knowledge of logarithmic functions and their properties.
  • Basic understanding of limits and infinity in calculus.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of improper integrals, focusing on convergence criteria.
  • Learn about the comparison test for integrals in greater detail.
  • Explore examples of valid and invalid comparisons in integral calculus.
  • Review the behavior of logarithmic functions as they approach infinity.
USEFUL FOR

Students of calculus, mathematics educators, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of convergence in improper integrals.

MermaidWonders
Messages
112
Reaction score
0
The big blue circle has been put there by my math prof to denote the location of the error in the following solution. Why is this an error? I'm lost. :(
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2018-02-21 at 12.24.01.png
    Screen Shot 2018-02-21 at 12.24.01.png
    22.6 KB · Views: 123
Physics news on Phys.org
$$\int_1^{\infty}\frac1x \, dx$$
does not converge. If you were to try to get an antiderivative, the only candidate is $\ln|x|$, so formally, you'd have
$$\int_1^{\infty}\frac1x \, dx = \ln|x|\big|_{1}^{\infty} =\ln(\infty)-\ln(1)=\ln(\infty)=\infty.$$
So it doesn't converge.
 
Ah, so is it like we're not supposed to do the "by comparison" for integrals, especially when we don't know whether the integral will be equal to infinity or not? I mean, why didn't she just circle the "converges as well" part?
 
Last edited:
MermaidWonders said:
Ah, so is it like we're not supposed to do the "by comparison" for integrals, especially when we don't know whether the integral will be equal to infinity or not? I mean, why didn't she just circle the "converges as well" part?

Comparison is fine, but it must be a VALID comparison. The idea would be capsulized as "closer to zero".

Bad Example: It is also true that for x > 1, we have -e^{x} < \dfrac{1}{x^{2}}, but that is not helpful.

In other words, your comparison must be on the same side of the x-axis.

... the only candidate is ln|x|...

This is a little excessive. For x \ge 1, we have \ln(x) as an additional candidate.
 
Can you explain what you mean by the fact that the "comparison must be on the same side of the x-axis"?
 
You error is that the "comparison test" applies only to positive functions. You cannot just say that [math]-\frac{1}{x}< \frac{1}{x^2}[/math]. Sometimes you can use the absolute value but it is NOT TRUE that [math]\left|-\frac{1}{x}\right|= \frac{1}{x}< \frac{1}{x^2}[/math].
 
Country Boy said:
You error is that the "comparison test" applies only to positive functions.

Well, BOTH positive, sure, but also BOTH negative would do.
 
tkhunny said:
Well, BOTH positive, sure, but also BOTH negative would do.

But "the other way around". If f(x) and g(x) are both positive with f(x)< g(x) and $\int g(x) dx$ converges then $\int f(x) dx$ converges.

If f(x) and g(x) are both negative and f(x)< g(x) (so that |g(x)|< |f(x)| and $\int f(x)dx$ converges then $\int g(x) dx$ converges.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K