Integral equation for large surfaces

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the evaluation of the surface integral ##\int_v(\nabla•A)dv=\int_s(A•ds)## for large surfaces and the conditions under which terms can be neglected. It is established that the vector field ##\vec A## must approach zero at infinity faster than the surface area grows to ensure the integral evaluates to zero. The example of a point charge is used to illustrate that the field decreases as ##\frac{1}{r^2}## while the surface area grows as ##r^2sin\theta d\theta d\phi##, demonstrating that the integral is not zero if the decay rate of the field is insufficient.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus, specifically surface integrals and divergence.
  • Familiarity with the behavior of vector fields at infinity.
  • Knowledge of spherical coordinates and their application in integrals.
  • Concept of point charges and their electric fields in physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of surface integrals in vector calculus.
  • Learn about the divergence theorem and its applications.
  • Explore the behavior of electric fields from point charges in detail.
  • Investigate the implications of decay rates of functions in mathematical analysis.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mathematicians, and engineering students interested in advanced calculus, particularly those focusing on electromagnetism and vector field theory.

Apashanka
Messages
427
Reaction score
15
We often neglect the terms of a surface integral ##\int_v(\nabla•A)dv=\int_s(A•ds)## for ##s## to be very large or ##v## to be very large,
What is actually the reason behind this to neglect??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The field ##\vec A## is assumed to go to zero at infinity at a rate faster than the rate at which the surface grows.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Dale and Apashanka
Orodruin said:
The field ##\vec A## is assumed to go to zero at infinity at a rate faster than the rate at which the surface grows.
Okk got it ...thanks @Orodruin
 
Orodruin said:
The field ##\vec A## is assumed to go to zero at infinity at a rate faster than the rate at which the surface grows.
But if the rate at which the vector field ##A## goes to zero at infinity is slower than the rate at which the surface grows ,then also it would be zero ,isn't it??
 
No. You need the assumption of the field going to zero fast enough. Take the example of the field of a single point charge.
 
Orodruin said:
No. You need the assumption of the field going to zero fast enough. Take the example of the field of a single point charge.
Ok the field decreses as ##\frac{1}{r^2}## and the spherical surface element centered at the point charge grows as ##r^2sin\theta d\theta d\phi##
 
Apashanka said:
Ok the field decreses as ##\frac{1}{r^2}## and the spherical surface element centered at the point charge grows as ##r^2sin\theta d\theta d\phi##
And so the integral is not zero.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Apashanka

Similar threads

  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K