Integral for the free propagator

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter NanakiXIII
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Propagator
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mathematical interpretation of the free propagator in Quantum Field Theory, specifically as described in A. Zee's "Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell." The expression for the free propagator, D(x-y) = ∫ (d^4 k)/(2π)^4 (e^(i k (x-y))/(k^2 - m^2 + i ε), involves a contour integral over k^0. The addition of a semicircular contour in the complex plane is a technique to ensure that the integral along the real line is valid and allows the application of the Residue theorem, facilitating the evaluation of the integral.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Klein-Gordon equation
  • Familiarity with contour integration in complex analysis
  • Knowledge of the Residue theorem
  • Basic principles of Quantum Field Theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the Residue theorem in complex integrals
  • Explore the mathematical foundations of the Klein-Gordon equation
  • Review contour integration techniques in complex analysis
  • Investigate the role of propagators in Quantum Field Theory
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in theoretical physics, particularly those focusing on Quantum Field Theory and complex analysis, will benefit from this discussion.

NanakiXIII
Messages
391
Reaction score
0
This may be more of a maths question, but because I may actually just be interpreting the expression wrong, I think I'd better post it here.

I'm reading Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell by A. Zee and I'm stuck on a bit of maths he does. He provides an expression for the free propagator for a particles described by the Klein-Gordon equation,

<br /> D(x-y) = \int \frac{d^4 k}{(2 \pi)^4} \frac{e^{i k (x-y)}}{k^2 - m^2 + i \epsilon}.<br />

Now, if I am not mistaken, the integral over four counts of k means integrating over k^0, k^1, k^2, k^3, each with integration limits -\infty and \infty.

He goes on to perform the integral over k^0, and he describes this as a contour integral in the complex plain. He takes this contour to be the real axis and an infinite semicircle to get back to -\infty. My question is, why does he add that semicircle? Once you've integrated over the real line, since the integration limits are -\infty and \infty, aren't you done? Or have I perhaps misinterpreted what he means to integrate over?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your interpretation of the integral is correct, what your books does is just a trick in order to be able to perform the integral. The idea is to make your integration complex and choose a contour such that the complex integral is zero, except the part on the real line (the integral along the infinite semicircle should give zero). This allows one to use for example the Residue theorem, and therefore one is able to perform the integration.

See this example http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Residue_theorem#Example".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ah, now I see. I was trying to figure out what was happening with the help of my book on Complex Variables, but now I see I was looking in quite the wrong chapters. Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
6K