Integral of Exp(I x) and the Dirac Delta

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The integral of the exponential function, specifically \(\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{i (k-k_0) x} dx\), results in the Dirac delta function \(\delta(k-k_0)\), establishing the orthogonality of momentum eigenstates for a free particle. When \(k\) equals \(k_0\), the integral diverges, but for \(k \neq k_0\), the integral evaluates to zero, confirming orthogonality. The discussion highlights the importance of complex analysis in understanding these integrals and their implications in quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and momentum eigenstates
  • Familiarity with the Dirac delta function and its properties
  • Basic knowledge of complex analysis, particularly integrals of exponential functions
  • Experience with Fourier transforms and their applications in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties and applications of the Dirac delta function in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the role of Fourier transforms in solving differential equations
  • Explore complex analysis techniques for evaluating improper integrals
  • Investigate the implications of orthogonality in quantum state functions
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focused on quantum mechanics, as well as mathematicians interested in complex analysis and its applications in physics.

hbweb500
Messages
40
Reaction score
1
I am trying to see why exactly the momentum eignenstates for a free particle are orthogonal. Simply enough, one gets:

[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{i (k-k_0) x} dx = \delta(k-k0)[/tex]

I can see why, if k=k0, this integral goes to zero. But if they differ, I don't see why it goes to zero. You have:

[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{i(k-k0)x} dx = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}( \cos [(k-k0)x] + i \sin [(k-k0)x]) dx[/tex]

Now the sine vanishes by symmetry, but what about Cos[x]? I would imagine this integral diverges, but it must go to zero for these to be orthogonal...

I am recalling a bit from complex analysis that might be useful, but for now I am in the dark. Why is this integral the dirac delta function.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Probably you have to write down what it means. Something like this:
[tex] \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} e^{i(k-k_0)x} g(k)\,dk\,dx = \begin{cases}<br /> g(k_0)\qquad\text{if }k=k_0<br /> \\<br /> 0\qquad\text{if }k\ne k_0<br /> \end{cases}[/tex]
for good enough function [itex]g[/itex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K