Integral of f·g ≠ integral f · integral g [True or False]

  • Thread starter Thread starter MiddleEast
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The statement "integral of f·g ≠ integral f · integral g" is determined to be false under the condition that the functions f or g equal zero, as well as in other specific cases. The discussion highlights the importance of qualifiers in mathematical statements, emphasizing that without explicit quantification, the statement can lead to confusion. Participants agree that the lack of clear notation for "not necessarily equal to" contributes to the ambiguity of the question. Ultimately, the consensus is that the statement should be considered false unless further qualified.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integral calculus
  • Familiarity with function notation and operations
  • Knowledge of logical quantifiers in mathematics
  • Basic concepts of mathematical semantics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of integrals involving products of functions
  • Learn about logical quantifiers and their implications in mathematical statements
  • Explore examples of functions where integrals yield different results
  • Investigate the notation and semantics used in advanced mathematics
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in the nuances of integral calculus and logical reasoning in mathematical statements.

MiddleEast
Messages
23
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
True or False : Integral of f·g ≠ integral f · integral g
Relevant Equations
NA
My answer is False! I think must stated "in general," in the beginning of the statement. Cause this could be true if f or g = zero. There may be other cases also.
Is my answer right?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mathwonk
Physics news on Phys.org
If integral of f·g ≠ integral f · integral g is false, then integral of f·g = integral f · integral g.

Thus this make sense?
 
Hmmm. Good point! The issue here is that my point is "sometime true sometimes false" & your point "If it not true, then it is always false". huge difference between my point of view and yours! I believe it has something to do with "logical mathematics" if there is something called so.

The issue if you said it is true then I have my counter-example.
 
You obviously understand the point, and the answer at this stage is semantics over the implicit qualifier. I think it's a confusing question.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker
There's no clear notation in mathematics for "not necessarily equal to". The best we can do is say something like, for example:

For functions ##f## and ##g## in general ##f \circ g \ne g \circ f##. Even though there are cases where equality holds.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SammyS and FactChecker
in my opinion, if the answer can only be true or false, that implies to me that the statement is universally quantified, so i would argue the correct answer should be false. since the statement is not explicitly quantified however, one could argue that it is poorly posed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Office_Shredder

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K