Integral of f·g ≠ integral f · integral g [True or False]

  • Thread starter Thread starter MiddleEast
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on whether the statement "integral of f·g ≠ integral f · integral g" is true or false. One participant argues that the statement is false, suggesting that it can be true under certain conditions, such as when either function is zero. The conversation highlights the ambiguity in mathematical notation regarding the universal quantification of the statement. Participants agree that the lack of clear qualifiers makes the question confusing and open to interpretation. Ultimately, the conclusion leans towards the idea that the statement is poorly posed due to its ambiguous nature.
MiddleEast
Messages
23
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
True or False : Integral of f·g ≠ integral f · integral g
Relevant Equations
NA
My answer is False! I think must stated "in general," in the beginning of the statement. Cause this could be true if f or g = zero. There may be other cases also.
Is my answer right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If integral of f·g ≠ integral f · integral g is false, then integral of f·g = integral f · integral g.

Thus this make sense?
 
Hmmm. Good point! The issue here is that my point is "sometime true sometimes false" & your point "If it not true, then it is always false". huge difference between my point of view and yours! I believe it has something to do with "logical mathematics" if there is something called so.

The issue if you said it is true then I have my counter-example.
 
You obviously understand the point, and the answer at this stage is semantics over the implicit qualifier. I think it's a confusing question.
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker
There's no clear notation in mathematics for "not necessarily equal to". The best we can do is say something like, for example:

For functions ##f## and ##g## in general ##f \circ g \ne g \circ f##. Even though there are cases where equality holds.
 
  • Like
Likes SammyS and FactChecker
in my opinion, if the answer can only be true or false, that implies to me that the statement is universally quantified, so i would argue the correct answer should be false. since the statement is not explicitly quantified however, one could argue that it is poorly posed.
 
  • Like
Likes Office_Shredder

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K