Integral with delta and unit step functions in the integrand

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hill
  • Start date Start date
Hill
Messages
735
Reaction score
575
Homework Statement
Show that $$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dk^0 \delta (k^2-m^2) \theta (k^0)=\frac 1 {2 \omega_k}$$ where ##\theta(x)## is the unit step function and ##\omega_k \equiv \sqrt {\vec k^2 +m^2}##.
Relevant Equations
##k^2={k^0}^2 - \vec k ^2##
##\omega _k ^2 = \vec k^2 +m^2##
##k^2 - m^2 = {k^0}^2 - \omega_k^2##
##dk^0= \frac {d{k^0}^2} {2k^0}##
##\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dk^0 \delta (k^2-m^2) \theta (k^0) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac {d{k^0}^2} {2k^0} \delta ({k^0}^2 - \omega_k^2) \theta (k^0) = \frac 1 {2 \omega_k} \theta (\omega_k) = \frac 1 {2 \omega_k}##

Wouldn't the result be the same without the unit step function?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hill said:
Homework Statement: Show that $$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dk^0 \delta (k^2-m^2) \theta (k^0)=\frac 1 {2 \omega_k}$$ where ##\theta(x)## is the unit step function and ##\omega_k \equiv \sqrt {\vec k^2 +m^2}##.
Relevant Equations: ##k^2={k^0}^2 - \vec k ^2##

##\omega _k ^2 = \vec k^2 +m^2##
##k^2 - m^2 = {k^0}^2 - \omega_k^2##
##dk^0= \frac {d{k^0}^2} {2k^0}##
##\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dk^0 \delta (k^2-m^2) \theta (k^0) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac {d{k^0}^2} {2k^0} \delta ({k^0}^2 - \omega_k^2) \theta (k^0) = \frac 1 {2 \omega_k} \theta (\omega_k) = \frac 1 {2 \omega_k}##

Wouldn't the result be the same without the unit step function?
With the theta function, $$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dk^0 \delta (k^2-m^2) \theta (k^0)=\int_{0}^{\infty} dk^0 \delta (k^2-m^2) $$

Without the theta function, we have $$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dk^0 \delta (k^2-m^2)$$ The integrand is an even function of ##k^0##, so $$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dk^0 \delta (k^2-m^2) = 2\int_{0}^{\infty} dk^0 \delta (k^2-m^2)$$ This is twice the result for the case with the theta function.

I good approach to evaluating the integral is to use property #7 of the delta function listed here.
Property #6 in the list is a special case of #7 and is directly relevant to your integral.
 
TSny said:
With the theta function, $$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dk^0 \delta (k^2-m^2) \theta (k^0)=\int_{0}^{\infty} dk^0 \delta (k^2-m^2) $$

Without the theta function, we have $$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dk^0 \delta (k^2-m^2)$$ The integrand is an even function of ##k^0##, so $$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dk^0 \delta (k^2-m^2) = 2\int_{0}^{\infty} dk^0 \delta (k^2-m^2)$$ This is twice the result for the case with the theta function.

I good approach to evaluating the integral is to use property #7 of the delta function listed here.
Property #6 in the list is a special case of #7 and is directly relevant to your integral.
Thank you very much. I see my mistake now: when replacing ##k^0## with ##\omega_k## I've missed that it can be ##+\omega_k## and ##-\omega_k##. The unit step function eliminates one of them.
 
The last part of that exercise is to show that $$\int \frac {d^3k} {2 \omega_k}$$ is Lorentz invariant.
Using the equation above, I get $$\int \frac {d^3k} {2 \omega_k}=\int {d^3k} \int dk^0 \delta (k^2-m^2) \theta (k^0)= \int d^4k \delta (k^2-m^2) \theta (k^0)$$
Now, ##d^4k## and ##k^2-m^2## are Lorentz invariant, but ##k^0## isn't. What do I miss?
 
Hill said:
The last part of that exercise is to show that $$\int \frac {d^3k} {2 \omega_k}$$ is Lorentz invariant.
Using the equation above, I get $$\int \frac {d^3k} {2 \omega_k}=\int {d^3k} \int dk^0 \delta (k^2-m^2) \theta (k^0)= \int d^4k \delta (k^2-m^2) \theta (k^0)$$
Now, ##d^4k## and ##k^2-m^2## are Lorentz invariant, but ##k^0## isn't. What do I miss?
The step-function ##\theta (k^0)## depends only on the sign of ##k^0## and so is invariant under any Lorentz transform that doesn't include time-reversal.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top