Integral with delta and unit step functions in the integrand

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hill
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the evaluation of the integral $$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dk^0 \delta (k^2-m^2) \theta (k^0)$$, demonstrating that it equals $$\frac{1}{2 \omega_k}$$ where $$\omega_k = \sqrt{\vec{k}^2 + m^2}$$. The inclusion of the unit step function $$\theta(k^0)$$ is crucial, as it restricts the integration to positive values of $$k^0$$, effectively eliminating the negative contribution. The discussion also highlights the Lorentz invariance of the integral $$\int \frac{d^3k}{2 \omega_k}$$, emphasizing the role of the delta function and the step function in maintaining this property.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of delta functions in calculus
  • Familiarity with unit step functions and their properties
  • Basic knowledge of Lorentz invariance in physics
  • Proficiency in manipulating integrals involving multiple variables
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the delta function, particularly property #7 relevant to integrals
  • Learn about the implications of Lorentz invariance in quantum field theory
  • Explore advanced techniques in evaluating integrals involving step functions and delta functions
  • Investigate the physical significance of the integral $$\int \frac{d^3k}{2 \omega_k}$$ in particle physics
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, particularly those focused on quantum field theory, as well as students and researchers dealing with integrals involving delta and step functions in theoretical contexts.

Hill
Messages
777
Reaction score
600
Homework Statement
Show that $$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dk^0 \delta (k^2-m^2) \theta (k^0)=\frac 1 {2 \omega_k}$$ where ##\theta(x)## is the unit step function and ##\omega_k \equiv \sqrt {\vec k^2 +m^2}##.
Relevant Equations
##k^2={k^0}^2 - \vec k ^2##
##\omega _k ^2 = \vec k^2 +m^2##
##k^2 - m^2 = {k^0}^2 - \omega_k^2##
##dk^0= \frac {d{k^0}^2} {2k^0}##
##\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dk^0 \delta (k^2-m^2) \theta (k^0) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac {d{k^0}^2} {2k^0} \delta ({k^0}^2 - \omega_k^2) \theta (k^0) = \frac 1 {2 \omega_k} \theta (\omega_k) = \frac 1 {2 \omega_k}##

Wouldn't the result be the same without the unit step function?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hill said:
Homework Statement: Show that $$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dk^0 \delta (k^2-m^2) \theta (k^0)=\frac 1 {2 \omega_k}$$ where ##\theta(x)## is the unit step function and ##\omega_k \equiv \sqrt {\vec k^2 +m^2}##.
Relevant Equations: ##k^2={k^0}^2 - \vec k ^2##

##\omega _k ^2 = \vec k^2 +m^2##
##k^2 - m^2 = {k^0}^2 - \omega_k^2##
##dk^0= \frac {d{k^0}^2} {2k^0}##
##\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dk^0 \delta (k^2-m^2) \theta (k^0) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac {d{k^0}^2} {2k^0} \delta ({k^0}^2 - \omega_k^2) \theta (k^0) = \frac 1 {2 \omega_k} \theta (\omega_k) = \frac 1 {2 \omega_k}##

Wouldn't the result be the same without the unit step function?
With the theta function, $$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dk^0 \delta (k^2-m^2) \theta (k^0)=\int_{0}^{\infty} dk^0 \delta (k^2-m^2) $$

Without the theta function, we have $$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dk^0 \delta (k^2-m^2)$$ The integrand is an even function of ##k^0##, so $$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dk^0 \delta (k^2-m^2) = 2\int_{0}^{\infty} dk^0 \delta (k^2-m^2)$$ This is twice the result for the case with the theta function.

I good approach to evaluating the integral is to use property #7 of the delta function listed here.
Property #6 in the list is a special case of #7 and is directly relevant to your integral.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Hill
TSny said:
With the theta function, $$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dk^0 \delta (k^2-m^2) \theta (k^0)=\int_{0}^{\infty} dk^0 \delta (k^2-m^2) $$

Without the theta function, we have $$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dk^0 \delta (k^2-m^2)$$ The integrand is an even function of ##k^0##, so $$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dk^0 \delta (k^2-m^2) = 2\int_{0}^{\infty} dk^0 \delta (k^2-m^2)$$ This is twice the result for the case with the theta function.

I good approach to evaluating the integral is to use property #7 of the delta function listed here.
Property #6 in the list is a special case of #7 and is directly relevant to your integral.
Thank you very much. I see my mistake now: when replacing ##k^0## with ##\omega_k## I've missed that it can be ##+\omega_k## and ##-\omega_k##. The unit step function eliminates one of them.
 
The last part of that exercise is to show that $$\int \frac {d^3k} {2 \omega_k}$$ is Lorentz invariant.
Using the equation above, I get $$\int \frac {d^3k} {2 \omega_k}=\int {d^3k} \int dk^0 \delta (k^2-m^2) \theta (k^0)= \int d^4k \delta (k^2-m^2) \theta (k^0)$$
Now, ##d^4k## and ##k^2-m^2## are Lorentz invariant, but ##k^0## isn't. What do I miss?
 
Hill said:
The last part of that exercise is to show that $$\int \frac {d^3k} {2 \omega_k}$$ is Lorentz invariant.
Using the equation above, I get $$\int \frac {d^3k} {2 \omega_k}=\int {d^3k} \int dk^0 \delta (k^2-m^2) \theta (k^0)= \int d^4k \delta (k^2-m^2) \theta (k^0)$$
Now, ##d^4k## and ##k^2-m^2## are Lorentz invariant, but ##k^0## isn't. What do I miss?
The step-function ##\theta (k^0)## depends only on the sign of ##k^0## and so is invariant under any Lorentz transform that doesn't include time-reversal.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Hill

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K