Integrate this equation by parts

  • Thread starter Thread starter Xetman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrate parts
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around integrating the function \( te^t \) using integration by parts. Participants are exploring different approaches to the problem and clarifying their understanding of the integration technique.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply integration by parts but questions the effectiveness of their chosen variables. Some participants discuss alternative assignments and the implications of those choices. Others suggest that the integral can be simplified by differentiating one term and integrating the other, raising questions about the best approach.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering insights into the integration by parts technique. There is a recognition that different choices can lead to varying complexities in the resulting integrals. Some guidance has been provided regarding the direction of differentiation and integration, although no consensus has been reached on the best method.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of a new concept referred to as "pushing up and down," which relates to the differentiation and integration of terms within the integrand. This terminology may not be familiar to all participants, indicating a potential gap in understanding.

Xetman
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Integrate ettdt using integration by parts.2. The attempt at a solution

Seems like a very easy problem; however, I just started learning integration by parts-- didn't understand this.

So the book's method:

u=t dv=etdt
du=dt v= et

uv-∫vdu=tet-∫etdt=tet-et+C.My method:

u=et dv=tdt
du=etdt v=t2/2uv-∫vdu=ett2/2-∫(t2/2)etdt

My method seems wrong, so can anyone please answer me why my method won't work?
Is it just about assigning the correct values to the correct variables?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your method is not wrong, but it is not helpful. Integration by parts offers several options. We want to replace our integral by a simpler one. Your integral is more complicated. ∫te^t dt can be traded for ∫t^2 e^t dt or ∫e^t dt, the former is worse the latter better. As you practice you will see what choice improves the situation and what does not.
 
lurflurf said:
∫te^t dt can be traded for ∫t^2 e^t dt or ∫e^t dt, the former is worse the latter better.

can you please explain how ? I'm confused..
 
Hi MrWarlock616! :smile:

tet is in two parts, t and et

you can push et up, and t down …

then et stays as et, and t becomes 1, then 0​

of you can push et down, and t up …

then et stays as et, and t becomes t2/2, then t3/6, then …​

the idea is to push in the direction that makes one of them disappear :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi MrWarlock616! :smile:

tet is in two parts, t and et

you can push et up, and t down …

then et stays as et, and t becomes 1, then 0​

of you can push et down, and t up …

then et stays as et, and t becomes t2/2, then t3/6, then …​

the idea is to push in the direction that makes one of them disappear :wink:
This must a new concept. I'm not familiar with the push up and down..but thanks!
 
The thing to keep in mind is that for elementary integration by parts problems, the tricky term is the integral one is left with. From the original integrand (which is the product of two terms), one term gets differentiated, while the other term gets integrated. Do that in your head, and if the product between the two resulting terms can now be integrated again more easily, then it's the right approach.

Writing it out makes it seem more complicated than it is! :biggrin:
 
MrWarlock616 said:
This must a new concept. I'm not familiar with the push up and down..but thanks!

The pushing "up and down" means "integrating and differentiating," respectively. I imagine tiny_tim was thinking of "pushing down" the degree of the "t" part of the original integrand, and the resulting integral (the v du part) would simply be et, as opposed to the one you got using your method.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K