Integrate y= arctan x for 0< x <1

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter 3ephemeralwnd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrate
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The integral of y = arctan(x) for the interval 0 < x < 1 can be solved using integration by parts, resulting in the expression x arctan(x) - ∫(x/(1+x²))dx. The correct evaluation of the integral ∫(x/(1+x²))dx yields ln|1+x²|. A common mistake occurs during substitution; specifically, using w = 1 + x² and dx = dw/(2x) requires careful attention to detail, as errors in algebraic manipulation can lead to incorrect results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Integration by parts
  • Substitution method in calculus
  • Understanding of logarithmic functions
  • Basic algebraic manipulation
NEXT STEPS
  • Practice integration by parts with different functions
  • Explore substitution methods in calculus
  • Study the properties of logarithmic functions
  • Review common algebraic mistakes in calculus
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, mathematicians focusing on integration techniques, and anyone seeking to improve their problem-solving skills in calculus.

3ephemeralwnd
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
the question: integrate y= arctanx for 0< x <1

i know to solve this question you should use the method of integral by parts, so i tried doing that and at some point i got
x arctanx - integral of x/1+x^2 (between 0 and 1)
.. from this point on i tried using the substitution method, w = 1 + x^2, and dx = dw / 2x
i plugged in those in and solved, but i didnt end up with the right answer

turns out the integral of x/1+x^2 is ln|1+x^2| ...
but shoudln't the method of substitution work as well? or did i do something wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi 3ephemeralwnd! :smile:

(try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)
3ephemeralwnd said:
… x arctanx - integral of x/1+x^2 (between 0 and 1)
.. from this point on i tried using the substitution method, w = 1 + x^2, and dx = dw / 2x
i plugged in those in and solved, but i didnt end up with the right answer

should have worked :confused:

(btw, it would be easier to write 2xdx = dw)

show us exactly what you did :smile:
 


oh sorry! i figured out my mistake

after the substituion i accidentally wrote it as w/2 instead of 1/2w

thanks for the reply though :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K