Integrating 3x^2*ln(x) - Is This Process Correct?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter feynmanpoint
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The integration of the function ∫3x^2*ln(x) was discussed, with the initial result being x^3*ln(x) - x^3/3 + c. A misstep occurred when the user incorrectly factored out x^3, leading to the erroneous conclusion of x^3*(ln(x) + c). The user acknowledged this mistake, recognizing that the factoring was invalid and rendered the final result incorrect.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integral calculus
  • Familiarity with logarithmic functions
  • Knowledge of constant terms in integration
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Review integration techniques for products of polynomials and logarithmic functions
  • Study the properties of logarithms in calculus
  • Learn about the concept of combining constants in integration
  • Practice solving similar integrals to reinforce understanding
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, mathematics educators, and anyone seeking to improve their integration skills, particularly with logarithmic functions.

feynmanpoint
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I was working on a question and would this work?

∫3x^2*ln(x)

After I did all of the math, I got to:

∫3x^2*ln(x)=x^3*ln(x)-x^3/3+c

The problem I am having is not with the actual integration but another step I took:

∫3x^2*ln(x)=x^3*(ln(x)-1/3+c)

I figured that -1/3+c just makes another constant so I left it as:

x^3*(ln(x)+c)

and distributing x^3 renders:

x^3*ln(x)-c*x^3

Is this process correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No problem combining constants, HOWEVER - Why did you take that other step (from 2nd equation to third)? That is, why do you think that other step is correct?
 
TheoMcCloskey said:
No problem combining constants, HOWEVER - Why did you take that other step (from 2nd equation to third)? That is, why do you think that other step is correct?

I now realize I was wrong. I factored out an x^3 even though it didn't have one making my conclusion worthless.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K