Integrating a dot product inside an exponential

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 7K views
naele
Messages
199
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


This is from Peskin & Schroeder p. 14 in case anybody's interested. The function is
[tex] U(t)=\frac{1}{(2\pi)^3}\int d^3p\, e^{-it \sqrt{p^2+m^2}}e^{i\vec p\cdot(\vec x-\vec x_0)}[/tex]

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Essentially you write out the dot product as [itex]p\cdot x'=px'\cos\theta[/itex] and then change to spherical coordinates and then effect a u-sub letting u=cos(theta). What I'm not sure on is why the angle is written with theta (the inclination angle, physicist convention) and not phi. I understand that the angle between two vectors is the same when projected onto a plane, but is that what's going on here? As in, the choice of theta is simply to make it easier for the integration?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you switch to spherical coordinates, the axes are set up so that the z axis is aligned with x-x0. You could, in principle, orient the axes differently. In that case, the angle between the two vectors will be a function of both θ and Φ, but why make things complicated?
 
Thank you, that clears everything up.