Integrating e^ax+by(a*cos(xy)-y*sin(xy)) with respect to x

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math10
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrate
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves integrating the expression e^(ax+by)(a*cos(xy) - y*sin(xy)) with respect to x. The context is within the subject area of calculus, specifically focusing on integration techniques.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various methods for integration, including integration by parts and substitution. Some express uncertainty about how to proceed with the integration, while others suggest different approaches and techniques, such as the table method and exponential substitution for trigonometric functions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring multiple strategies for tackling the integration problem. Some have offered guidance on techniques like integration by parts and substitution, while others are questioning the effectiveness of these methods and sharing their experiences with similar problems.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of treating y as a constant during the integration process, and participants are considering the implications of this assumption. Additionally, some participants note the potential complexity of the problem and the possibility of returning to similar forms during integration.

Math10
Messages
301
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Integrate e^(ax+by)(a*cos(xy)-y*sin(xy)) with respect to x.

Homework Equations


None.

The Attempt at a Solution


The answer is (cos(xy))(e^(ax+by)). I know that I need to treat y as a constant since I'm integrating it with respect to x but I don't know how to integrate this at all. Please help me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here is the equation in a LaTeX format:

$$\int e^{ax+by}(a*cos(xy) - ysin(xy)) dx = a \int e^{ax+by}cos(xy) dx - y \int e^{ax+by}sin(xy) dx$$

I believe integration by parts should take it from here.
 
Let me try.
 
I tried integration by parts but it seems that it complicates the problem even more.
Here's my work:
u=cos xy
dv=ae^(ax+by) dx
du=-y*sin(xy)
v=e^(ax+by)
(cos(xy))(e^(ax+by))-integral of (e^(ax+by))(-y*sin(xy))
 
Have you been introduced to the table method? It makes integration by parts a little bit easier to manage.

I hope you have a lot of paper laying around for this one.
 
Have you seen the exponential substitution for ##\sin ## and ##\cos##?
##\sin xy = \frac{e^{ixy}-e^{-ixy}}{2i}, \quad \cos xy = \frac{e^{ixy}+e^{-ixy}}{2}##.
Handling this integration on exponentials will be much simpler.
 
Nevermind, this looks like a better candidate for substitution.
Try ##u = e^{ax+by} a cos(xy)##. What would du be?
 
Zondrina said:
Here is the equation in a LaTeX format:

$$\int e^{ax+by}(a*cos(xy) - ysin(xy)) dx = a \int e^{ax+by}cos(xy) dx - y \int e^{ax+by}sin(xy) dx$$

I believe integration by parts should take it from here.
And the above can be simplified slightly by bringing eby outside each integral. The property I'm using is that eu + v = eu * ev. Since the integration is to be done with respect to x, any factors involving just y can be considered constants, and brought out of the integration.

To do each integral, you'll need to use integration by parts twice. It will seem that you're going around in circles, as you end up with something similar to what you started with (if you do it right), but you can solve algebraically for the integral. Your textbook probably has an example of this technique.
 
After you pull the ##e^{by}## out as Mark suggested, you're left with an integrand of ##ae^{ax}\cos xy - e^{ax}y\sin xy##. My first thought upon seeing that integrand was that it looked like it might be the result of the product rule because ##ae^{ax}## is the derivative of ##e^{ax}##. A quick check verified that it was indeed, making the integration trivial. Doing stuff like that can help you avoid a lot of unnecessary work.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
  • #10
How does the table method of integration by parts work? I've never been taught using that method.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K