Integrating e^(-x^2) to Solve for √(π/2)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jamin2112
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the integral of the function e^(-x^2) and its relation to the value √(π/2). Participants are exploring the implications of Fubini's theorem in the context of evaluating double integrals.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand the legality of separating integrals using Fubini's theorem. Some participants express surprise at not having learned this method earlier and question the teaching approach regarding double integrals.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively discussing the application of Fubini's theorem and its conditions. There is an acknowledgment of the need for definite integral limits in the context of the Gaussian integral, suggesting a productive direction in the conversation.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the necessity for definite integration limits, specifically from 0 to +infinity, which is common for the Gaussian integral. Some participants reflect on their prior educational experiences regarding the teaching of multiple integrals.

Jamin2112
Messages
973
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement



On the next exam I'm supposed to show that ∫e^(-x^2)dx = √(π/2).

Homework Equations



?

The Attempt at a Solution



When the professor was showing us one way to do it, I remember him doing a step that was like

∫e^(-x^2)dx ∫e^(-x^2)dx = ∫∫e^(-x^2 - y^2) dx dy.

Is that legal? I never knew ∫f(x)dx ∫g(y)dy = ∫∫f(x)g(y) dx dy.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


LeonhardEuler said:
Yes, it's called Fubini's theorem:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fubini's_theorem
(See the corollary where f(x,y)=g(x)h(y))
There are some conditions on when it can be used, you can read about it on the wiki article.

Why was never told this before? Many of my previous classes would've been easier if I could solve a double integral by just splitting it into two easier single integrals.
 


Jamin2112 said:
Why was never told this before? Many of my previous classes would've been easier if I could solve a double integral by just splitting it into two easier single integrals.

The normal way of evaluating integrals in dimensions 2 and higher basically is this method, though it isn't usually presented using this theorem at first from what I remember.
 


Jamin2112 said:

Homework Statement



On the next exam I'm supposed to show that ∫e^(-x^2)dx = √(π/2).

Pay attention, you need to have a definite integral, with integration limits. The common integration limits for the Gauss bell are 0 and +infinity.
 


Jamin2112 said:
Why was never told this before? Many of my previous classes would've been easier if I could solve a double integral by just splitting it into two easier single integrals.
That certainly is in any Calculus text I have ever seen. I can't speak for your class but every introduction to multiple integration class I have ever seen (and I have seen many) starts from the fact that if f(x,y)= g(x)h(y) and the area of integration is the rectangle [itex]a\le x\le b[/itex], [itex]c\le y\le d[/itex], then
[tex]\int f(x,y)dxdy= \left(\int_a^b g(x)dx\right)\left(\int_c^d h(y)dy\right)[/tex].

Of course, NOT every integral can be separated like that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K