Integrating over all possible fields

  • Thread starter Thread starter quantumfireball
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fields Integrating
Click For Summary
Integrating over all possible fields in the path integral formulation of quantum field theory involves summing over all potential field configurations to derive physical predictions. This method is crucial for understanding field quanta and is favored in modern research due to its natural alignment with concepts like Effective Field Theory and renormalization group analysis. While second quantization provides a foundational understanding, transitioning to the path integral approach is recommended for practical applications in quantum field theory. Key resources for learning include Ashok Das's book, which connects path integrals to traditional quantum mechanics, and A. Zee's "Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell" for a pedagogical introduction. Mastery of both approaches enhances comprehension and application in the field.
quantumfireball
Messages
90
Reaction score
0
What does it really mean to integrate over all possible fields in the Path integral formulation of quantum field theory,and how does such a formalism goes out to decribe
field quanta?

Another question is
im new to Quantum field theory
i was wondering whether i should stick to the old second quantization approach of QFT or would it be better to directly jump to path integral method of doing QFT
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suggest you to read the book "field theory" Ashko Das. ther is areal good deduction of path integrals... starting from Q.M. and then discretizing the Minkoskwy space time. before there is an introduction to path untegral approach an then you will get the idea of pertirbation theory and Feynman diagrams. If you want a canonical approach i suggest u QFT Itzykinson Zuber. this Book use the operator algebra not the Feynman Integral..
Buty show also the connection...
Quantum and statistical field theorie from LE BELLAC is a really good one also...

It is not so easy to transmit the power of Feynman view in a post.
but trust me... he invinted a new area and a new conception of QM. There was another INTERPRETATION (a new explanation). In DAS bookk u can find an euristic equivalence of feynman QM and Heisenberg/Schrodinger one...

bye
have a good time
 
Practicing Quantum Field Theorists almost always use path-integral quantization when deriving things. The modern concept of Effective Field Theory and RG analysis, as well as Yang-Mills quantization, are much more natural in this formalism. You should be sure to understand 2nd Quantization, but then you should try to get comfortable with Feynman - his formalism is what you'll most likely be using when doing research.
 
Not "Ashko Das" but "Ashok Das"
 
quantumfireball said:
What does it really mean to integrate over all possible fields in the Path integral formulation of quantum field theory,and how does such a formalism goes out to decribe
field quanta?

Another question is
im new to Quantum field theory
i was wondering whether i should stick to the old second quantization approach of QFT or would it be better to directly jump to path integral method of doing QFT
A good pedagogic intro to QFT that starts from the path integral approach and explains it in a nice way is
A. Zee, Quantum field theory in a Nutshell (2003)
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
573
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K