Integrating sin^2x: Trig Substitution or Identity? | Quick Question"

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Anonymous217
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the integration of the function sin²x, specifically whether to use the trigonometric identity (1 - cos(2x))/2 or to apply integration by parts. Participants share their methods and experiences with teaching and grading practices related to this integration problem.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the necessity of using the trigonometric substitution (1 - cos(2x))/2 for integrating sin²x, stating they achieved the same result using the identity 1 - cos²x.
  • Another participant suggests that the problem resembles a textbook integration by parts scenario, implying that this might be the method preferred by the participant's teacher.
  • A later reply confirms that both methods of integration (trigonometric substitution and integration by parts) yield valid results, but emphasizes that the choice may depend on the instructor's preferences.
  • One participant clarifies that their inquiry was not for a graded assignment, indicating the context of their question.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that both methods of integration are valid; however, there is no consensus on whether one method is required over the other, as this may depend on individual teaching practices.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not resolve the question of which method is preferred or required in educational settings, and it highlights the variability in teaching approaches regarding integration techniques.

Anonymous217
Messages
355
Reaction score
2
Hi guys, I have a quick question.
When integrating [tex]\int sin^2xdx[/tex], do you need to use the trig substitution [tex]\frac{1-cos(2x)}{2}[/tex]?
I was able to integrate it using just [tex]1-cos^2x[/tex] as my identity and even when I showed a calc teacher how I solved the problem, he doesn't believe me or my math for some reason even though I proved that the two methods get the same result but in a different form.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anonymous217 said:
Hi guys, I have a quick question.
When integrating [tex]\int sin^2xdx[/tex], do you need to use the trig substitution [tex]\frac{1-cos(2x)}{2}[/tex]?
I was able to integrate it using just [tex]1-cos^2x[/tex] as my identity and even when I showed a calc teacher how I solved the problem, he doesn't believe me or my math for some reason even though I proved that the two methods get the same result but in a different form.

The best way to know is for you to post your math.
 
That looks like a textbook integration by parts problem. Could that be how your teacher wants you to solve it?
 
Yeah, I did it using integration by parts even though I was supposed to use the trig substitution.
[tex]\int sin^2xdx[/tex]
[tex]Let u = sinx, dv = sinxdx[/tex]
[tex]du = cosxdx, v = -cosx[/tex]
[tex]-sinxcosx + \int cos^2xdx[/tex]
[tex]\int sin^2xdx = -sinxcosx + \int 1 - sin^2xdx[/tex]
[tex]\int sin^2xdx = -sinxcosx + x - \int sin^2xdx[/tex]
[tex]2\int sin^2xdx = -sinxcosx + x[/tex]
[tex]\int sin^2xdx = \dfrac{1}{2}x - \dfrac{1}{2}sinxcosx[/tex]

Both should work right? You don't "have" to use the cos(2x) thing right?
 
They both definitely work. But whether or not you have to use Trig.Sub. is up to who ever controls your grade.
 
Okay cool. And this wasn't for a grade or anything just to be clear.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K