Integrating with Gamma: cos(theta)^(2k+1)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Elliptic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gamma Integrating
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the integral of cos(theta)^(2k+1) from 0 to π/2 and expressing it in terms of the gamma function. The standard method involves integration by parts, leading to a reducing formula that can be expressed as a ratio of factorials. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding the gamma function's relationship to factorials and suggest deriving the solution independently. The beta function is also mentioned as an alternative approach, providing a more elegant solution.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integration techniques, specifically integration by parts.
  • Familiarity with the gamma function and its relationship to factorials.
  • Knowledge of the beta function and its derivation.
  • Basic trigonometric identities and properties of definite integrals.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the gamma function and its applications in calculus.
  • Learn about the beta function and its relationship to the gamma function.
  • Practice integration by parts with various trigonometric functions.
  • Explore the cosine integral and its properties in mathematical analysis.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those studying calculus, integral equations, and special functions like the gamma and beta functions.

Elliptic
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Solve the integral annd express it through the gamma f

Homework Equations



cos(theta)^(2k+1)

The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • integral.gif
    integral.gif
    1.8 KB · Views: 518
Physics news on Phys.org
You mean:
\int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \cos^{2k+1}(\theta)d\theta... eg: evaluate the definite integral of an arbitrary odd-power of cosine.

The standard approach is to start by integrating by parts.
You'll end up with a reducing formula which you can turn into a ratio of factorials - apply the limits - after which it is a matter of relating that to the factorial form of the gamma function.

eg. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/CosineIntegral.html
 
Simon Bridge said:
You mean:
\int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \cos^{2k+1}(\theta)d\theta... eg: evaluate the definite integral of an arbitrary odd-power of cosine.

The standard approach is to start by integrating by parts.
You'll end up with a reducing formula which you can turn into a ratio of factorials - apply the limits - after which it is a matter of relating that to the factorial form of the gamma function.

eg. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/CosineIntegral.html

Its difficult do see what is happening here.
 

Attachments

  • Eqn3.gif
    Eqn3.gif
    3.1 KB · Views: 529
If it was easy there'd be no point setting it as a problem.
I'm not going to do it for you ...

Do you know what a gamma function is? You can represent it as a factorial?
Can you identify where you are having trouble seeing what is going on?
Perhaps you should try to do the derivation for yourself?
 
Last edited:
Simon Bridge said:
If it was easy there'd be no point setting it as a problem.
I'm not going to do it for you ...

Do you know what a gamma function is? You can represent it as a factorial?
Can you identify where you are having trouble seeing what is going on?
Perhaps you should try to do the derivation for yourself?

Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • Eqn3.gif
    Eqn3.gif
    2.9 KB · Views: 510
Really? And I thought I was being mean...

The trig-form of the beta function aye - yep, that's a tad more elegant that the path I was suggesting before (the more usual one)... but relies on a hand-wave: do you know how the beta function is derived?

Also - you have \frac{1}{2}B(\frac{1}{2},k+1) but you've spotted that.

If you look at the cosine formula - you have to evaluate the limits ... at first it looks grim because it gives you a sum of terms like \sin\theta\cos^{2k}\theta which is zero at both limits ... unless k=0 ... which is the first term in the sum, which is 1.

After that it is a matter of subbing in the factorial representation of the gamma function.
Which would be a concrete proof.

Yours is shorter and if you have the beta function in class notes then you should be fine using it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K