Integrating x/2: Why is u-substitution not being used?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 2K views
bobsmith76
Messages
336
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Screenshot2012-02-10at55111AM.png


I don't understand why the x/2 is not being integrated. I would think one should use u substitution. u = x/2, du = x, but they're not doing that.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually the book referred has used this substitution and have finally put u=x/2 again as question is asked in form of x/2 and not in u.
 
Actually, they DID, but they skipped a couple of steps (like explaining HOW they integrated). If you try a u-substitution, you'll get the same answer they did.