MHB Integration by parts curious question (chem's question at Yahoo Answers)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving the integral of sin(x^1/2)/x^1/2 using integration by parts. The correct solution is identified as -2cos(x^1/2), with a detailed explanation provided on how to derive this result. The method involves recognizing the integral as an immediate form and applying integration by parts effectively. There is a debate about whether the solution relies on prior knowledge of the integral's value or if it can be derived independently. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the nuances of integration techniques and their applications in calculus.
Fernando Revilla
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
631
Reaction score
0
Here is the question:
Hi,

I am doing an integration by parts question but cannot work out how to get the solution. Any help would be greatly appreciated, cheers.

Integrate:

sin(x^1/2)/x^1/2

I know the solution is -2cos(x^1/2) but I do not know how to get to this.

Here is a link to the question:

Integration by parts question? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello chem,

We have an inmediate integral: $$\displaystyle\int\frac{\sin x^{1/2}}{x^{1/2}}dx=2\int\frac{\sin x^{1/2}}{2x^{1/2}}dx=2\int\sin x^{1/2}d(x^{1/2})=-2\cos x^{1/2}+C$$ Now, we can use the integration by parts method: $$\left \{ \begin{matrix}u=1\\dv=\frac{\sin x^{1/2}}{x^{1/2}}dx\end{matrix}\right.\Rightarrow \left \{ \begin{matrix}du=0dx\\v=-2\cos x^{1/2}\end{matrix}\right.\Rightarrow\\\int\frac{\sin x^{1/2}}{x^{1/2}}dx=1\cdot\left(-2\cos x^{1/2}\right)+\int 0\;dx=-2\cos x^{1/2}+C$$
 
Fernando Revilla said:
Hello chem,

We have an inmediate integral: $$\displaystyle\int\frac{\sin x^{1/2}}{x^{1/2}}dx=2\int\frac{\sin x^{1/2}}{2x^{1/2}}dx=2\int\sin x^{1/2}d(x^{1/2})=-2\cos x^{1/2}+C$$ Now, we can use the integration by parts method: $$\left \{ \begin{matrix}u=1\\dv=\frac{\sin x^{1/2}}{x^{1/2}}dx\end{matrix}\right.\Rightarrow \left \{ \begin{matrix}du=0dx\\v=-2\cos x^{1/2}\end{matrix}\right.\Rightarrow\\\int\frac{\sin x^{1/2}}{x^{1/2}}dx=1\cdot\left(-2\cos x^{1/2}\right)+\int 0\;dx=-2\cos x^{1/2}+C$$

Clearly You can proceed on this way only if You know a priori that...$$\int \frac{\sin \sqrt{x}}{\sqrt{x}}\ dx = -2\ \cos \sqrt{x} + c\ (1)$$... so that properly specking that is not an integration by parts. Very interesting is using (1) and integration by parts to arrive to an important result. Let's suppose to integrate by parts setting $u=\frac {\sin \sqrt{x}}{\sqrt{x}}$ and $v=1$... $$\int \frac{\sin \sqrt{x}}{\sqrt{x}}\ dx = \sqrt{x}\ \sin \sqrt{x} - \frac{1}{2}\ \int \cos \sqrt{x}\ dx + \frac{1}{2}\ \int \frac{\sin \sqrt{x}}{\sqrt{x}}\ dx\ (2)$$

... and from (1) and (2) You arrive to the result...

$$\int \cos \sqrt{x}\ dx = 2\ (\cos \sqrt{x} + \sqrt{x}\ \sin \sqrt{x}) + c\ (4)$$

In similar way You arrive to...

$$\int \sin \sqrt{x}\ dx = 2\ (\sin \sqrt{x} - \sqrt{x}\ \cos \sqrt{x}) + c\ (3)$$

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
chisigma said:
Clearly You can proceed on this way only if You know a priori that... $$\int \frac{\sin \sqrt{x}}{\sqrt{x}}\ dx = -2\ \cos \sqrt{x} + c\ (1)$$

We don't suppose a priori the value of the given integral. We simply find $v=\displaystyle\int\frac{\sin x^{1/2}}{x^{1/2}}dx=\ldots=-2\cos x^{1/2}$ as an inmediate integral. It is irrelevant if we find it in the first or in the second line.

P.S. At any case, the title 'Integration by parts curious question' is meaningful. :)
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top