MHB Integration by parts, why is this allowed?

Click For Summary
Integration by parts allows for the selection of functions u and dv from the integral, where u is typically a function to differentiate and dv is a function to integrate. In the example of integrating ln(x), u is set as ln(x) and dv as dx, leading to du being 1/x dx and v being x. The key point is that while dv must be part of the original integral, v does not need to appear in the original equation. This flexibility is what makes integration by parts a powerful technique in calculus. Understanding this principle clarifies the legality of the chosen functions in the integration process.
find_the_fun
Messages
147
Reaction score
0
I'm following this example where it is asked to integrate [math]\int \ln{x} dx[/math] using integration by parts. I don't understand how it's legal to set v=x since the only x in the equation is the argument of ln and that's already accounted for by u.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Re: integration by parts, why is this allowed?

We are actually setting:

$$u=\ln(x)\,\therefore\,du=\frac{1}{x}\,dx$$

$$dv=dx\,\therefore\,v=x$$
 
Re: integration by parts, why is this allowed?

MarkFL said:
We are actually setting:

$$u=\ln(x)\,\therefore\,du=\frac{1}{x}\,dx$$

$$dv=dx\,\therefore\,v=x$$

Ok I think I get it. So with integration by parts you choose dv before you calculate v? In other words dv has to be part of the original equation but v does not?
 
Re: integration by parts, why is this allowed?

find_the_fun said:
Ok I think I get it. So with integration by parts you choose dv before you calculate v? In other words dv has to be part of the original equation but v does not?

Correct...integration by parts states:

$$\int u\,dv=uv-\int v\,du$$

So, you want to choose a $u$ and a $dv$, and then from these compute $du$ and $v$.
 
Any time you use "integration by parts",
\int udv= uv- \int v du, there is NO "v" in the original integral. You get it by your choice of "dv".

Here, the choice is dv= dx, u= ln(x).
 
If it helps you can think of

$$\int \ln(x) dx = \int \left(1 \times \ln(x) \right)dx$$

Then you can set $$\frac{dv}{dx} = 1$$ and $$u = \ln(x)$$
 
Thread 'Problem with calculating projections of curl using rotation of contour'
Hello! I tried to calculate projections of curl using rotation of coordinate system but I encountered with following problem. Given: ##rot_xA=\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial y}-\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial z}=0## ##rot_yA=\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial z}-\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial x}=1## ##rot_zA=\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial y}=0## I rotated ##yz##-plane of this coordinate system by an angle ##45## degrees about ##x##-axis and used rotation matrix to...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K