Integration - Dr. Evil is my teacher

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding the arc length of a function defined as s(t) = t³ - 6t² + 9t + 5 over the interval from t = 0 to t = 5 seconds. Participants are discussing the appropriate formula for arc length and the complexities involved in evaluating the integral.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of the arc length formula and the need to differentiate the function to find s'(t). There are questions about the correct form of the integral and whether the integral should be evaluated exactly or approximated. Some participants suggest reconsidering the interpretation of the problem as finding the distance traveled rather than arc length.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various interpretations being explored. Some participants have provided guidance on the formula and differentiation, while others are questioning the assumptions about the problem's requirements and the nature of the integral.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding whether the problem requires an exact evaluation of the integral or if approximation methods are acceptable. Additionally, the interpretation of the function as representing distance traveled rather than arc length is under consideration.

steve2212
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Right I won't bore you with a sob story but this is a regular grade 12 class and we've been posed with this problem:

Find the arc length of this function across first 5 seconds (t = seconds)

s(t) = t3 - 6t2 + 9t + 5

I learned the formula of s = Integral of (1+f'(x)^2)1/2 * dx

So I began using the Riemann sums until I get here, I'm not quite sure how to proceed.

http://img26.imageshack.us/img26/6931/formulaz.jpg

If need be I will show how I got up to there, it just takes forever to use LaTeX.

PS: That should be x->infinity

Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it will be easier if you use the formula you were given

Arc Length [itex]:= \int_0^t \left( 1 + s'(t)^2 \right)^{\frac{1}{2}} dt[/itex]

now just sub in for [itex]s'(t)[/itex] (which you'll need to work out.

also the upper limit on the integral will become the time that you want to go to. in this case 5 seconds.
 
latentcorpse said:
I think it will be easier if you use the formula you were given

Arc Length [itex]:= \int_0^t \left( 1 + s'(t)^2 \right)^{\frac{1}{2}} dt[/itex]

now just sub in for [itex]s'(t)[/itex] (which you'll need to work out.

also the upper limit on the integral will become the time that you want to go to. in this case 5 seconds.

Is the integral going to be:

[tex]\frac{2}{3} (x+3(x^{2}-4x+3)^3)^\frac{3}{2}[/tex]

for the function

[tex](1+9(x^{2}-4x+3)^2)^\frac{1}{2}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Your integrand is correct, but should be in terms of t, not x. IOW, it should be (1 + 9(t2 - 4t + 3)2)1/2.

What you show for the antiderivative of the function above is incorrect. You can verify this by taking the derivative of what you showed, and seeing if you get (1 + 9(t2 - 4t + 3)2)1/2.
 
I tried my best and got this as my final integral, however Mathmetica shows a 14 page integral with complex roots..

[tex]\frac{2}{3}\left [ x+3 \frac{(x^2-4x+3)^2}{\frac{x^3}{3} - 2x^2 + 3x} \right ]^\frac{3}{2}[/tex]
 
Obviously, this is a difficult integral to evaluate exactly. Are you supposed to get the exact answer, or can you use an approximation technique such as Simpson's rule?

Or can you just leave it as an unevaluated definite integral?
 
Perhaps everyone is misinterpreting the problem. Usually a formula such as:

s(t) = t3 - 6t2 + 9t + 5

would describe the position of an object at time t. And instead of "arc length" you would mean the distance traveled. This makes sense for a grade 12 problem. And the catch is that the total distance traveled between t = 0 and t = 5 is not simply s(5) - s(0). That gives the change in position but the object reverses course part of the time. That's the calculus problem -- you have to include the distance going backwards and retracing your position.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
14K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K