Integration of Ricci Scalar Over Surface

darida
Messages
35
Reaction score
1
Does this integration of Ricci scalar over surface apply in general or just for compact surfaces?

∫RdS = χ(g)

where χ(g) is Euler characteristic.
And could anybody give me some good references to prove the formula?
 
on Phys.org
On a non-compact surface, the integral might fail to converge. Take hyperbolic space, for example.
 
This might still be true when the integral converges though ?
 
I'm not sure.

Another way to look at this is an order-of-limits issue. Consider a modified integral for computing the Euler number of manifolds-with-boundary. This integral will contain a boundary term (sorry, I don't remember what it looks like). Then you can take any non-compact surface, and just cut a piece out of it, adding a boundary and making the integral finite. Perform the integral first, and then take the limit as the boundary goes to infinity.

I think this will give you an Euler number of 1 for the infinite plane. It is homologous to the disk, and boundaries add 1 to the Euler number.
 
For a non compact surface, I was more thinking of compacification with a point/curve at infinity and hopefully making use of R=0 at infinity... But you're right the boundary term can make this whole business tricky.
 
In the non-compact case where the integral does converge, the total curvature can be less than 2πχ(S).

The flat plane has zero total curvature 0 but has Euler characteristic 1.

For a compact manifold with boundary one needs to add on the total geodesic curvature of the bounding curve.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: darida and wabbit

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K