Interacting Fermion System Commutation

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 1K views
Xyius
Messages
501
Reaction score
4
Problem Question
My question isn't an entire homework problem, but rather for a certain mathematical step in the problem which I assume to be very simple.

The problem is dealing with interacting fermion systems using second quantization formulas. I am essentially following my notes from class for this problem and the part I am stuck on is this.

[tex]<0,0|a_{2 \uparrow} a_{1 \uparrow}a_{1 \uparrow}^{\dagger}a_{2 \uparrow}^{\dagger}a_{1 \uparrow}a_{2 \uparrow}a_{1 \uparrow}^{\dagger}a_{2 \uparrow}^{\dagger}|0,0>=-1[/tex]

My question is, why is this equal to -1?

Attempt at Solution
Here is my logic on how to evaluate this.

[tex]a_{1 \uparrow}^{\dagger}a_{2 \uparrow}^{\dagger}|0,0>=|\uparrow \uparrow>[/tex]
then
[tex]a_{1 \uparrow}a_{2 \uparrow}|\uparrow \uparrow>=|0,0>[/tex]
then
[tex]a_{1 \uparrow}^{\dagger}a_{2 \uparrow}^{\dagger}|0,0>=|\uparrow \uparrow>[/tex]
finally
[tex]a_{2 \uparrow} a_{1 \uparrow}|\uparrow \uparrow>=|0,0>[/tex]
Thus all together I get 1, not -1. Why is this equal to -1?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Xyius said:
Here is my logic on how to evaluate this.

[tex]a_{1 \uparrow}^{\dagger}a_{2 \uparrow}^{\dagger}|0,0>=|\uparrow \uparrow>[/tex]
then
[tex]a_{1 \uparrow}a_{2 \uparrow}|\uparrow \uparrow>=|0,0>[/tex]
I believe the mistake is in the second equation above. There are sign conventions for Fermion operators operating on Fock states.

See equations 4, 5, and 6 here: http://www.phys.ufl.edu/~kevin/teaching/6646/03spring/2nd-quant.pdf
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Xyius