Interface (Maxwell-Wagner) Polarization and Dielectric Loss

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Maxwell-Wagner polarization refers to the polarization occurring at interfaces, such as grain boundaries, when subjected to an electric field. This phenomenon results in significant dielectric loss due to the separation of charges over considerable distances, which can amplify loss by orders of magnitude. The discussion highlights the need for further exploration of the relationship between charge separation and dielectric loss, particularly referencing the limitations of accessible literature, such as the cited textbook not being available to all participants.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Maxwell-Wagner polarization
  • Familiarity with dielectric materials and their properties
  • Knowledge of electric field interactions with materials
  • Access to relevant academic literature on dielectric loss
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mechanisms of dielectric loss in materials
  • Explore the role of grain boundaries in electrical conductivity
  • Study the impact of charge separation on dielectric properties
  • Review academic textbooks or articles on Maxwell-Wagner polarization
USEFUL FOR

Materials scientists, electrical engineers, and researchers focused on dielectric materials and their applications in electronics will benefit from this discussion.

citw
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
Maxwell-Wagner polarization is generally described in literature as the polarization of interfaces, such as grain boundaries, with an applied electric field. In the Wikipedia article (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell–Wagner–Sillars_polarization), it's mentioned that "the charges are often separated over a considerable distance and the contribution to dielectric loss can therefore be orders of magnitude larger...".

I'm still trying to understand the origin of dielectric loss, so can someone please explain why "larger" charge separation leads to more substantial loss?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, Wikipedia ... Did you check the articles cited?
 
DrDu said:
Well, Wikipedia ... Did you check the articles cited?

Unfortunately, the specific citation for this point is a textbook that I do not have access to.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
9K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K