Interior product with differential forms

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the application of interior products in differential geometry, specifically regarding the manipulation of differential forms. The user confirms their understanding of the interior product calculations, such as (∂/∂x, dx∧dy) = dy and (∂/∂z, dx∧dy∧dz) = dx∧dy. The conversation emphasizes the importance of notation and definitions in understanding the interior product, particularly how the tensor is treated as a linear map. The user is reassured that their calculations are correct, highlighting the process of anti-commuting coordinate differentials.

PREREQUISITES
  • Differential Geometry fundamentals
  • Understanding of differential forms
  • Knowledge of exterior products and their properties
  • Familiarity with tensor notation and operations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of interior products in differential geometry
  • Learn about the anti-commutation of differential forms
  • Explore the relationship between tensors and linear maps
  • Review examples of differential forms in various coordinate systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in mathematics, particularly those studying differential geometry, as well as educators looking to clarify concepts related to differential forms and interior products.

dyn
Messages
774
Reaction score
63
Hi. I'm trying to self-study differential geometry and have come across interior products of vectors and differential forms. I will use brackets to show the interior product and I would just like to check I am understanding something correctly. Do I need to manipulate the differential form to get the differential to be differentiated at the front of the form ? ie
( ∂/∂x , dx∧dy ) = dy and ( ∂/∂x , dy∧dx ) = -dy

( ∂/∂z , dx∧dy∧dz ) = dx∧dy and ( ∂/∂z , dx∧dz∧dy ) = -dx∧dy

Have I got this right ? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is really difficult to tell unless you first specify what notation you are using and how you have defined your interior product. As it appears, you have defined the interior product in such a way that ##(X,\omega)(X_1,X_2,\ldots) = \omega(X,X_1,X_2,\ldots)##, where ##\omega## is a tensor of type ##(0,n)##, i.e., essentially using ##X## as the first argument of ##\omega## (seen as a linear map from ##(T_pM)^n## to the real numbers).

You can then use the fact that ##dx \wedge dy = dx \otimes dy - dy \otimes dx## to verify your identity. When you have ##\partial/\partial x## you would get
$$
\left(\frac{\partial}{\partial x}, dy \wedge dx\right) = \underbrace{dy(\partial_x)}_{=0} dx - \underbrace{dx(\partial_x)}_{=1} dy = -dy.
$$
Of course, when you have the differential form expressed in the coordinate differentials, you can generally just anti-commute the relevant coordinate differential to the first position. All terms where it is not in the first position will vanish identically and the interior product will just correspond to anti-commuting the relevant coordinate differential to the front and then removing it from the exterior product.
 
Thanks for your reply. I don't understand everything in your post but it sounds like I am right in the calculations .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K