Internal resistence: chicken and egg misconcpetion

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between current, voltage, and internal resistance in a battery circuit, specifically using the equations EMF - Ir = V and V = IR. It is established that an increase in load current results in a decrease in terminal voltage due to the battery's internal resistance. The current in the battery differs from the current across the circuit, and the overall current is determined by the total resistance, which includes both internal and external resistances. The concepts of equilibrium in current flow and the behavior of ideal conductors are also clarified.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Ohm's Law (V = IR)
  • Familiarity with the concept of electromotive force (EMF)
  • Knowledge of internal resistance in batteries
  • Basic principles of circuit analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the impact of internal resistance on battery performance
  • Learn about circuit analysis techniques involving Kirchhoff's laws
  • Explore the behavior of reactive components in circuits
  • Investigate the differences between ideal and non-ideal conductors
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, physics students, and anyone involved in battery technology or circuit design will benefit from this discussion, particularly those looking to understand the dynamics of current and voltage in the presence of internal resistance.

davidbenari
Messages
466
Reaction score
18
I feel like have a chicken and egg type of problem regarding internal resistences because of the following problem:

The voltage across a battery with internal resistance is given by the equation
EMF-Ir=V
Given the voltage across the battery then the voltage in the circuit is
V=IR

So, if I have more current then my voltage decreases, if I have less voltage then my current decrease because of V=IR.

So what's happening here?

If I have an increase in current, then it immediately drops?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The voltage across a battery with internal resistance is given by the equation
EMF-Ir=V
Given the voltage across the battery then the voltage in the circuit is
V=IR
... given the voltage across the battery (which is, properly, the voltage across the load) - but the voltage across the battery depends on the size of the load. The fact the voltage is "given" means some earlier steps have already been completed.

To treat the circuit properly, you need to know the EMF and internal resistance. Given those, you can work out the current in the circuit and, thus the voltage dropped across the load.
 
So, if I have more current then my voltage decreases, if I have less voltage then my current decrease because of V=IR.

Correct.

If the load draws more current the battery terminal voltage V decreases due to the internal resistance of the battery.

If the battery terminal voltage V decreases then the current flowing in the load will decrease due to Ohms law (assuming the load obeys ohms law)..

These aren't inconsistent. You can plot a graph of I vs V for both of the above. Where the lines cross will be a valid solution to both.
 
The I in the battery is not the same I across the circuit.
 
davidbenari said:
So what's happening here?

If I have an increase in current, then it immediately drops?

Thanks.
Not at all. As you lower the resistance of the load, the current will increase until an equilibrium situation is reached. Nothing has to drop back down again because it will not 'overshoot'. (Unless you include reactive elements in your circuit; but let's sort out the straightforward case first).
 
xAxis said:
The I in the battery is not the same I across the circuit.

I think you will find it is.
 
I'm going to be irrelevant here, but in a circuit, if we assume a constant current, then the electric field inside the ideal conductors (not the resistors) is zero right? Otherwise charges would accelerate.

Thanks.
 
davidbenari said:
I'm going to be irrelevant here, but in a circuit, if we assume a constant current, then the electric field inside the ideal conductors (not the resistors) is zero right?
Right. That's what makes them ideal.

Otherwise charges would accelerate.
Yes, but it's more helpful to consider that if the electric field is not zero then there must be some potential difference between the two ends of the conductor, therefore some non-zero resistance... And then it's not an ideal conductor.
 
davidbenari said:
I'm going to be irrelevant here, but in a circuit, if we assume a constant current, then the electric field inside the ideal conductors (not the resistors) is zero right? Otherwise charges would accelerate.

Thanks.
You are describing what can happen in a beam of electrons. But that isn't a metal conductor.

If there is no change in potential then no work is done and no acceleration. This is all very basic stuff but it does need thinking about from time to time, to avoid reaching some strange conclusions about the nature of things.
 
  • #10
davidbenari said:
The voltage across a battery with internal resistance is given by the equation
EMF-Ir=V
Given the voltage across the battery then the voltage in the circuit is
V=IR
Combine the two equations:
EMF - I r = I R
EMF = I (R+r)

There is nothing surprising or "chicken and egg" here. The current is simply determined by the total resistance, which is the sum of the internal and external resistances. The open circuit voltage is equal to the EMF, and the short circuit current is equal to EMF/r.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
12K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K