MHB Interpreting Constant A & Deriving k in Air Pressure Decay

fuzz95
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
hey guys! I'm really confused as to what this question is trying to ask me!
can someone help me out :)

Air pressure decays approximately exponentially at about 0.4 per cent for each rise of 30 metres above sea level. If we let p = p(h) denote air pressure (measured in some appropriate units) at h metres above sea level, then we can model this phenomenon using the equation: p = p(h) = Aekh for some appropriate constants A and k.

Give an interpretation for the constant A. (We never need to know the actual numerical value of A to do the rest of this exercise.)
?and how do i derive this k = ln(0.996) / 30 ??thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi, and welcome to the forum!

fuzz95 said:
If we let p = p(h) denote air pressure (measured in some appropriate units) at h metres above sea level, then we can model this phenomenon using the equation: p = p(h) = Aekh for some appropriate constants A and k.
This must be $p(h)=Ae^{kh}$. In plain text, it is customary to write exponentiation using ^, and don't forget the order of operations: exponentiation is done before multiplication. Therefore, in plain text p(h) can be written as A*e^(kh).

fuzz95 said:
Give an interpretation for the constant A.
Hint: At what height the pressure is $A$?

fuzz95 said:
and how do i derive this k = ln(0.996) / 30 ??
The statement "Air pressure decays approximately exponentially at about 0.4 per cent for each rise of 30 metres above sea level" amounts to
\[
p(h+30)=0.996p(h).
\]
Substitute the definition of $p$ and see if you can solve this equation for $k$.
 
okay so i was able to do the first part!

however still have no idea how to go about doing the second half??!
 
fuzz95 said:
however still have no idea how to go about doing the second half??!

Evgeny.Makarov said:
The statement "Air pressure decays approximately exponentially at about 0.4 per cent for each rise of 30 metres above sea level" amounts to
\[
p(h+30)=0.996p(h).
\]
Substitute the definition of $p$ and see if you can solve this equation for $k$.
Well, let me do this for you. Substituting $p(h)=Ae^{kh}$ into the equation above gives
\[
Ae^{k(h+30)}=0.996Ae^{kh}.
\]
Can you solve it for $k$? If not, do you know basic properties of exponeniation? Do you know that $\ln(x)$ is the inverse of $e^x$? Have you seen any exponential equations solved? Have you solved any yourself? You may need to do some preparatory work.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top