Interpreting Line Integrals: Is My Understanding Correct?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
chaoseverlasting
Messages
1,051
Reaction score
3
I have a rough idea of what a line integral is, please correct me if I am wrong:

If a function y=f(x) is being integrated over a curve c=g(x), what we are doing is picking points off of the curve c, putting them through f(x) and summing the individual values that we get to infinity (or sum of infinitely small values between a given set of limits). In other words, the integral

[tex]I=\int f(x)[/tex] (I is a Line Integral) from a to b over a curve c may be re written as:

[tex]I'=\int f(g(x))[/tex] (I' is a normal integral) from a to b, where g(x) is the curve c.

What this really means is that we are first applying a transformation c=g(x) to the x axis, and then defining a curve y=f(x) on this transformed x-axis and then finding the area between f(x) and the transformed x-axis between the limits a and b. Am I right in this interpretation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's pretty much it. A visualization for a very simple example of f:R2->R2 and g:[0,1]->R2 is given here.
 
Thank you for confirming it and for the link as well. I am so happy I am actually beginning to understand the language used by mathematicians! Sounds like Greek sometimes!