Intersection and Addition of Subspaces

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the intersection and addition of subspaces in linear algebra, specifically addressing the problem of determining the existence of a subspace T such that S + T = V and S ∩ T = {0}. The participants analyze the linear independence of sets formed by adding vectors not in the span of S, ultimately concluding that if L(S) ≠ V, a process can be established to construct T. The proof strategy involves starting with a basis for V and ensuring that part of this basis serves as the basis for S, as suggested by user feedback on the approach.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear algebra concepts, particularly subspaces and linear independence.
  • Familiarity with vector spaces and their bases.
  • Knowledge of the notation and terminology used in linear algebra, such as L(S) and span.
  • Experience with proof techniques in mathematics, especially in the context of vector spaces.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of vector space bases and their properties.
  • Learn about linear independence and how to determine it in sets of vectors.
  • Research the process of constructing subspaces and their intersections.
  • Explore advanced topics in linear algebra, such as dimension theory and theorems related to subspace addition.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those focusing on linear algebra, as well as researchers and practitioners who require a deeper understanding of vector spaces and subspace interactions.

TranscendArcu
Messages
277
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://img824.imageshack.us/img824/3849/screenshot20120122at124.png

The Attempt at a Solution


Let [itex]S = \left\{ S_1,...,S_n \right\}[/itex]. If [itex]L(S) = V[/itex], then [itex]T = \left\{ 0 \right\}[/itex] and we are done because [itex]S + T = V[/itex]. Suppose that [itex]L(S) ≠ V[/itex]. Let [itex]B_1 \in T[/itex] such that [itex]B_1 \notin L(S)[/itex]. Then the set [itex]Q =\left\{ S_1,...,S_n,B_1 \right\}[/itex] is linearly independent. If [itex]L(Q) = V[/itex] then we are done since [itex]S + T = V[/itex] and [itex]S \cap T[/itex] [itex]= \left\{ 0 \right\}[/itex]. If not, then we may repeat the preceding argument beginning with the set Q. Thus, we would create a new set, call it Q', where [itex]Q' = \left\{ S_1,...,S_n,B_1,B_2 \right\}[/itex] and [itex]B_1,B_2 \notin S[/itex]. Then, if [itex]L(Q') = V[/itex], then we are done. If not, then we continue as above. This process must certainly end because V is itself stated to be finite. Thus, such a T as in the problem must exist.

I think I'm going in the right direction, but I'm not sure if I'm executing the proof correctly.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I see where you are going, and you have the right concept. To be a bit clearer, how about starting with a basis for V, and let some part of that basis be the basis for S. Then go from there.
 
Sorry, but TranscendArc's method is better. You can't simply assume that there exist a basis for V that includes a basis for S. It is true, of course, but TranscendArc's method proves that.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K