Intersection of a paraboloid and a plane

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the intersection of a paraboloid and a plane, specifically the paraboloid defined by z = x^2 + y^2 and the plane given by x - 2y = 0. Participants are exploring how to parametrize the curve of intersection and verify its validity within both surfaces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to find a parametrization by substituting y with a parameter t and expressing x and z in terms of t. Some participants affirm the correctness of this approach, while others express a desire for further clarification on the method's applicability to different equations.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes affirmations of the original poster's work, with some participants indicating that the approach is valid. However, there is also a shift to a related question involving a different paraboloid and plane, where the original poster expresses uncertainty about the method's applicability due to the presence of an additional variable.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities introduced by different equations and the potential for imaginary numbers in the calculations. The original poster's concern about the correctness of their method in the context of the second problem highlights the challenges of working with multiple variables.

Stevecgz
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
Question: Consider the intersection of the paraboloid [tex]z = x^2 + y^2[/tex] with the plane [tex]x - 2y = 0[/tex]. Find a parametrization of the curve of intersection and verify that it lies in each surface.

How I went about it:

[tex]x = 2y[/tex]
[tex]z = (2y)^2 + y^2 = 5y^2[/tex]

Set [tex]y = t[/tex], then

[tex]x = 2t[/tex]
[tex]y = t[/tex]
[tex]z = 5t^2[/tex]

I don't know that my answer is wrong, I'm just not certain if I am going about it the correct way. If someone could let me know I would appreciate it. Thanks.

Steve
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I plotted both the parabolaoid and the plane in one plot and the parametric spacecurve in another plot (using Maple) and they do appear to agree, also your work is without flaw. Good job.
 
Yes, it really is that simple!
 
Thanks for the replys.

Steve
 
HallsofIvy said:
Yes, it really is that simple!

If only the rest of calculus were this easy :smile:
 
A similar question - but more variables are present:

Find the intersection of the plane 2x-y-3z=15 and the paraboloid 3z=(x^2)/16 + (y^2)/9

I was unable to use the above method because of the "z" variable in the plane equation. Can I still use the above method? Or is something else necessary?

I plugged 3z=15+2x-y into the equation for the paraboloid and started getting imaginary numbers, was that correct?

"At the end of the number line is a rainbow made out of nothing but primes..."
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
12K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K