MHB Interval of eigenvalues using Gershgorin circles

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the intervals of eigenvalues for the matrix A using Gershgorin circles. It is established that all eigenvalues must lie within the union of the row Gershgorin circles and the union of the column Gershgorin circles. The confusion arises regarding whether the eigenvalues should be found in the intersection of these unions or in the intersection of individual circles. The conclusion drawn is that the eigenvalues are indeed located in the intersection of the unions of row and column circles, as demonstrated through the provided visual representation. This analysis clarifies the relationship between the row and column Gershgorin circles in identifying eigenvalue locations.
mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

We have the matrix $$A=\begin{pmatrix}2 & 0.4 & -0.1 & 0.3 \\ 0.3 & 3 & -0.1 & 0.2 \\ 0 & 0.7 & 3 & 1 \\ 0.2 & 0.1 & 0 & 4\end{pmatrix}$$ We get the row Gershgorin circles: $$K_1=\{z\in \mathbb{C} : |z-2|\leq 0.8 \} \\ K_2=\{z\in \mathbb{C} : |z-3|\leq 0.6 \} \\ K_3=\{z\in \mathbb{C} : |z-3|\leq 1.7 \} \\ K_4=\{z\in \mathbb{C} : |z-4|\leq 0.3 \} $$ and the column Gershgorin circles: $$K_1'=\{z\in \mathbb{C} : |z-2|\leq 0.5 \} \\ K_2'=\{z\in \mathbb{C} : |z-3|\leq 1.2 \} \\ K_3'=\{z\in \mathbb{C} : |z-3|\leq 0.2 \} \\ K_4'=\{z\in \mathbb{C} : |z-4|\leq 1.5 \} $$

To get the intervals of the eigenvalues, we have to look at the union of all row circles and the union of all column circles, or not?

Then at the result we have to take the intersection, or not?

Till now I have seen only examples where $A=A^T$ and so the row and column circles are the same, and so I am confused here.

(Wondering)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
According to the wiki article, the way I see it, ALL the eigenvalues of $A$ must lie in
$$\displaystyle\cup_{i=1}^4K_i,$$
as you've defined them, AND ALL the eigenvalues of $A$ must lie in
$$\displaystyle\cup_{i=1}^4K_i'.$$
Therefore, all the eigenvalues of $A$ must lie in
$$\displaystyle\left(\cup_{i=1}^4K_i\right)\cap\left(\cup_{i=1}^4K_i'\right).$$
I don't think you can say that the eigenvalues must lie in
$$\cup_{i=1}^4(K_i\cap K_i'),$$
which is what I would be tempted to think, unless you can show those are equivalent.
 
Hey mathmari!

I have just read the wiki article about Gershgorin circles.
As I understand it, and this is verifiable from the proofs that are given in the article:
  • All eigenvalues are in the union of all row circles.
  • All eigenvalues are in the union of all column circles.
  • If the row circles can be divided into disjoint unions, then each disjoint union contains exactly as many eigenvalues as there are circles in it.
    Same for the column circles.
(Cool)

In this case there is a row circle that overlaps all other row circles.
And there is also a column circle that overlaps all others.
So I think the only thing we can say, is that all eigenvalues are in the intersection of the row-union and the column-union. (Thinking)
 
So this is what it looks like:
\begin{tikzpicture}
\newcommand{\coordinates}{
\draw[help lines] (0,-2) grid (6,2);
\draw[-stealth] (0,0) -- (6.4,0) node[label=Re]{};
\draw[stealth-stealth] (0,-2.3) -- (0,2.3) node[label=right:Im]{};
\draw[fill] foreach \i in {1,...,6} { (\i,0) node[yshift=-2cm,label=below:\i]{} };
\draw foreach \i in {-2,...,2} { (0,\i) node[label=left:\i]{} };
}

\newcommand{\rowcircles}{
(2,0) circle (0.8)
(3,0) circle (0.6)
circle (1.7)
(4,0) circle (0.3)
}
\newcommand{\colcircles}{
(2,0) circle (0.5)
(3,0) circle (1.2)
circle (0.2)
(4,0) circle (1.5)
}

\begin{scope}
\coordinates
\filldraw[red, fill opacity=.3] \rowcircles node[above left] at (2.3,1.4) {row circles};
\filldraw[blue, fill opacity=.3] \colcircles node[above right] at (4,1.4) {column circles};
\fill
(2,0) circle (1pt)
(3,0) circle (1pt)
(4,0) circle (1pt);
\end{scope}

\begin{scope}[xshift=8cm]
\coordinates
\clip\rowcircles;
\path[fill=red!50!blue, fill opacity=.6] \colcircles;
\draw (1.8617,0) circle (2pt)
(4.0368,0) circle (2pt)
(3.0508,0.2407) circle (2pt)
(3.0508,-0.2407) circle (2pt);
\end{scope}
\end{tikzpicture}
The small circles on the right are the actual eigenvalues. (Malthe)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
2K
2
Replies
56
Views
10K
Replies
125
Views
19K
Back
Top