Intro to Analysis (Differentiation)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the differentiability of a continuous function defined on a closed interval, specifically examining the implications of having a derivative that approaches a limit at one endpoint of the interval. Participants are tasked with proving or disproving the statement regarding differentiability at the endpoint based on the behavior of the derivative within the interval.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the use of the Mean Value Theorem and the definition of differentiability to construct a proof. Questions arise about how to establish the existence of a limit and the implications of having a limit for the derivative at the endpoint.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of different approaches to the proof, with some participants suggesting the use of the Mean Value Theorem and others questioning how to connect the existence of a limit to differentiability. Several participants express confusion about the final steps in their reasoning, indicating a productive but unresolved discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the necessity of epsilon-delta arguments in their proofs, while others consider specific examples that challenge the original statement, noting cases where a function is continuous and has a limit for its derivative but is not differentiable at a certain point.

bloynoys
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove or disprove:
Suppose f:[a,b]->R is continuous. If f is diff on interval (a,b) and f'(x) has a limit at b, then f is diff at b.


Homework Equations



We say that f is differentiable at x0 to mean that there exists a number A such that:
f(x)=f(x0)+A(x-x0)+REM
where,
lim(x->x0) REM(x)/(x-x0) = 0


The Attempt at a Solution



We will prove f is diff at b by showing that that there exists a number A so that f(x)=f(b)+A(x-b)+REM
so,
lim(x->x0) REM(x)/(x-b) = 0

I have gotten good at normal proofs in this course and am very confused on how to build proofs with this diff theorem. I know that this is true, but am confused how to fashion the plan and how to start the proof. How do I establish the existence of an A that satisfies this?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Write a difference quotient for f'(b) and use the Mean Value Theorem. That works, doesn't it?
 
Hmm. How would I go about doing that? I know by the mean value theorem there is a c in (a,b) that is satisfied by f'(c)=f(b)-f(a)/b-a but how can I show that since f'(c) exists f'(b) exists since it is not for every c in the interval?
 
bloynoys said:
Hmm. How would I go about doing that? I know by the mean value theorem there is a c in (a,b) that is satisfied by f'(c)=f(b)-f(a)/b-a but how can I show that since f'(c) exists f'(b) exists since it is not for every c in the interval?

f'(b)=limit x->b (f(b)-f(x))/(b-x). There is a c such that f'(c) equals that quotient in (x,b).
 
So I can say that because f'(x) has a limit at b the function limit x->b (f(b)-f(x))/(b-x)=f'(b)?

So a proof would go something like:

We will prove f is diff at b by showing that f'(b)=f'(b)=limit x->b (f(b)-f(x))/(b-x).

Since f'(x) has a limit at b, we know limit x->b (f(b)-f(x))/(b-x)=f'(b).

Thus, we know that the function is diff. at b.
 
bloynoys said:
So I can say that because f'(x) has a limit at b the function limit x->b (f(b)-f(x))/(b-x)=f'(b)?

So a proof would go something like:

We will prove f is diff at b by showing that f'(b)=f'(b)=limit x->b (f(b)-f(x))/(b-x).

Since f'(x) has a limit at b, we know limit x->b (f(b)-f(x))/(b-x)=f'(b).

Thus, we know that the function is diff. at b.

You need to mention the mean value theorem and show where you used it.
 
Alright I have been working on this proof all dayish trying to get everything work out right.

I have for my plan:

Suppose x<c<b

We will prove f'(c) has a limit m at b by showing that for every ε>0 there exists an δ>0 so that for every x in (a,b) 0<abs(x-b)<δ where abs(f'(c)-m)<ε.

Consider ε>0 arb.
Since by the mean value theorem and the def of derivative we know that limit x->b (f(b)-f(x))/(b-x)=lim c->b (f'(c)) and (f(b)-f(a))/(b-a)=f'(c) as a<x<c<b. We know that there is a δ that satisfies this. Choose such a δ.

Consider x in (a,b) arb.

for such an x,

abs(f'(c)-m))...

Then I don't know how to build that final inequality to make it work.


Any suggestions?
 
bloynoys said:
Alright I have been working on this proof all dayish trying to get everything work out right.

I have for my plan:

Suppose x<c<b

We will prove f'(c) has a limit m at b by showing that for every ε>0 there exists an δ>0 so that for every x in (a,b) 0<abs(x-b)<δ where abs(f'(c)-m)<ε.

Consider ε>0 arb.
Since by the mean value theorem and the def of derivative we know that limit x->b (f(b)-f(x))/(b-x)=lim c->b (f'(c)) and (f(b)-f(a))/(b-a)=f'(c) as a<x<c<b. We know that there is a δ that satisfies this. Choose such a δ.

Consider x in (a,b) arb.

for such an x,

abs(f'(c)-m))...

Then I don't know how to build that final inequality to make it work.


Any suggestions?

You don't need epsilons or deltas. You know f'(b)=limit x->b (f(b)-f(x))/(b-x). The MVT tells you that there is a c(x) in (x,b) such that f'(c(x))=(f(b)-f(x))/(b-x). As x->b it must be that c(x)->b. Since you know f'(c(x)) approaches a limit as c(x)->b doesn't that tell you the difference quotient must have a limit?
 
Since you know f'(c(x)) approaches a limit as c(x)->b doesn't that tell you the difference quotient must have a limit?

May be a dumb question but we know there is a limit at b, but trying to say if it is differentiable. How can we make the leap that there is a limit at b to that it is differentiable at b?

I am following all of your logic (hopefully!) but that is the part I am hung up about. Thanks!
 
  • #10
bloynoys said:
May be a dumb question but we know there is a limit at b, but trying to say if it is differentiable. How can we make the leap that there is a limit at b to that it is differentiable at b?

I am following all of your logic (hopefully!) but that is the part I am hung up about. Thanks!

If the limit of the difference quotient exists then f(x) is differentiable at b. At least, it has a one sided derivative. There's not much you can say about the other side because f is only defined on [a,b].
 
  • #11
I feel like disproving it. Take \displaystyle f\left(x\right)=\sqrt[3]{x}. Take a = -1, b = 0. Is it differentiable on (-1,0)? Yes. Note that it's open. Is it continuous? Yes. f'(a) as a->0 does have a limit, -∞. (Yes, this is considered a limit.) But ... it's not differentiable at 0.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K