Intro to Linear Algebra - Nullspace of Rank 1 Matrix

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the nullspace of a rank 1 matrix in linear algebra, specifically addressing the dimensionality of the nullspace in relation to its representation in R^n. Participants are examining whether the nullspace should be considered a plane or an (n-1) dimensional space.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the definition of the nullspace and its dimensionality, questioning why it is described as a plane in R^n. There are discussions about specific examples, such as a 1x2 matrix and its corresponding nullspace, leading to inquiries about the accuracy of published solutions.

Discussion Status

Multiple interpretations of the nullspace's dimensionality are being explored, with some participants suggesting that the term "plane" may be misleading and proposing the use of "hyperplane" for clarity. There is an ongoing examination of the definitions and properties of subspaces in relation to rank 1 matrices.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential discrepancies in published solutions and the importance of verifying problem statements. There is a recognition that the terminology used may vary based on the dimensional context, leading to further discussion on the implications of such terminology.

fractalizard
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Given A is a mxn matrix with rank 1, the nullspace is a _____ in R^n.
Relevant Equations
N(A) = Linear combination of "special solutions" to A
The published solutions indicate that the nullspace is a plane in R^n. Why isn't the nullspace an n-1 dimensional space within R^n? For example, if I understand things correctly, the 1x2 matrix [1 2] would have a nullspace represented by any linear combination of the vector (-2,1), which would be a line.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An (n-1) dimensional subspace in \mathbb{R}^n is analagous to a plane in \mathbb{R}^3: they are given by an equation of the form \mathbf{x} \cdot \mathbf{n} = 0.
 
fractalizard said:
Homework Statement: Given A is a mxn matrix with rank 1, the nullspace is a _____ in R^n.
Relevant Equations: N(A) = Linear combination of "special solutions" to A

The published solutions indicate that the nullspace is a plane in R^n.
That sounds wrong. Are you sure that you copied the problem statement exactly? The problem statement or the book answer might have a typo. Or the book might just need some more proofreading. It's very hard to eliminate all errors from a book.
fractalizard said:
Why isn't the nullspace an n-1 dimensional space within R^n?
It is. You can verify the properties of a subspace.
 
fractalizard said:
Homework Statement: Given A is a mxn matrix with rank 1, the nullspace is a _____ in R^n.
Relevant Equations: N(A) = Linear combination of "special solutions" to A

The published solutions indicate that the nullspace is a plane in R^n. Why isn't the nullspace an n-1 dimensional space within R^n? For example, if I understand things correctly, the 1x2 matrix [1 2] would have a nullspace represented by any linear combination of the vector (-2,1), which would be a line.
Perhaps the authors of the solution meant that the nullspace was a hyperplane; an object of dimension one less than that of ##\mathbb R^n##.

For a 2x2 matrix of rank 1, the domain is ##\mathbb R^2## and the nullspace is of dimension 1, so the nullspace is a line in ##\mathbb R^2##.

For a 3x4 matrix of rank 1, the domain is ##\mathbb R^4## and the nullspace is of dimension 3, so the nullspace is a hyperplane in ##\mathbb R^4##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim mcnamara and mathwonk
Wow, this place is great - thanks for the quick replies. I suspected that this might be an error in the solution. FYI, my posted problem statement was only the piece of the original problem that I was having trouble with, here is the full problem statement:

40 only.png
And from the solution manual:

40 answer.png


The highlighted line is the piece I am having trouble understanding, the rest of the solution makes sense to me.
 
fractalizard said:
The highlighted line is the piece I am having trouble understanding, the rest of the solution makes sense to me.

As I stated above, every (n - 1) dimensional subspace is \{ \mathbf{x} \in \mathbb{R}^n: \mathbf{x} \cdot \mathbf{a} = x_1a_1 + \cdots + x_na_n = 0\} for some \mathbf{a} \neq 0. This is analagous to a plane in \mathbb{R}^3. In higher dimensions one might more properly call it a hyperplane.
 
fractalizard said:
And from the solution manual:

View attachment 326075
The highlighted line is the piece I am having trouble understanding, the rest of the solution makes sense to me.
Hi @fractalizard. Welcome to PF.

In addition to the other excellent replies I’d like to add a (non-mathematician's) example which might help.

Say ##A## is a ##4 \times 4## matrix. If the rank = 1 then any row is a scalar multiple of any other row, For example:

##A = \begin {bmatrix}
a&b&c&d \\
3a&3b&3c&3d\\
-2a&-2b&-2c&-2d\\
4a&4b&4c&4d
\end{bmatrix}##

So in this example we have rows: ##R_2=3R_1, ~R_3= -2R_1## and ##R_4 =4R_1##.

Take the vector ##\textbf {x}=\begin {bmatrix} x_1\\x_2\\x_3\\x_4 \end {bmatrix}##

##A \textbf {x}=\begin {bmatrix}
R_1\cdot \textbf {x}\\
3R_1\cdot \textbf {x}\\
-2R_1\cdot \textbf {x}\\
4R_1\cdot \textbf {x}
\end {bmatrix}##

To make ##A \textbf {x}=0 ## (i.e. for ##\textbf {x}## to be in A’s null space) we require only that ##R_1\cdot \textbf {x} = 0##.

This gives the required ‘single equation’ (mentioned in the soution manual): ##ax_1 + bx_2 + cx_3 + dx_4= 0##

This equation defines a ‘plane’ in ##\mathbb R^n##. Though, as already has been said, for n>3 the term ‘hyperplane’ could be used to avoid confusion with 2D planes. (Also, note that for n = 2, the so-called ‘plane’ would a line!)
 
pasmith said:
As I stated above, every (n - 1) dimensional subspace is \{ \mathbf{x} \in \mathbb{R}^n: \mathbf{x} \cdot \mathbf{a} = x_1a_1 + \cdots + x_na_n = 0\} for some \mathbf{a} \neq 0. This is analagous to a plane in \mathbb{R}^3. In higher dimensions one might more properly call it a hyperplane.

The same way a line is always 1 dimension, I would think of a plane with no prefix as being 2 dimensions.
 
Office_Shredder said:
I would think of a plane with no prefix as being 2 dimensions.
This...
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
26K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K