Intro to Philosophy: Knowledge and Reality or Philosophy: Practical Logic?

In summary, when deciding between two potentially interesting courses for a physics major, it would be more beneficial to focus on the professors teaching the courses rather than the course descriptions. However, caution should be taken when using sites like ratemyprofessor, as there may be biases and potential trolling that can skew the reviews.
  • #1
JoshGuthrie
4
0
Which course do you guys think would be more interesting/helpful for a physics major? They are both 100 level, Intro consists of two lectures and a seminar a week, and Practical Logic consists of a three hour lecture once a week.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Whichever has the most writing.
 
  • Like
Likes JoshGuthrie
  • #3
Both sound like classes that could be potentially interesting.

What I would do is less focus on the class descriptions, and more focus on who the professors are going to be. Go to ratemyprofessor and see what the professors will be like.
 
  • Like
Likes JoshGuthrie
  • #4
quickquestion said:
Both sound like classes that could be potentially interesting.

What I would do is less focus on the class descriptions, and more focus on who the professors are going to be. Go to ratemyprofessor and see what the professors will be like.

I second this. Philosophy courses are either some of the most interesting courses you will take, or the most boring and useless. The deciding factor is the professor.
 
  • Like
Likes StatGuy2000, JoshGuthrie and Evo
  • #5
Logic. It is sorely lacking in undergraduates.
 
  • Like
Likes JoshGuthrie
  • #6
Dishsoap said:
I second this. Philosophy courses are either some of the most interesting courses you will take, or the most boring and useless. The deciding factor is the professor.

I agree with this, and not just for philosophy classes, but all humanities classes. The value of such courses is highly dependent on the professor.

However, there is a caveat -- one of the issues with sites like ratemyprofessor is that there may be a potential bias involved in terms of the types of responses that "students" enter. Students who may have an axe to grind against a professor (say, for giving a grade that the student may deem unfair, no matter how justified the professor's actions may be), will be disproportionately likely to judge the professor on the site negatively, whereas students who have had a positive experience may not necessarily be inclined to respond as such.

Furthermore, how does sites like ratemyprofessor prevent trolling among supposed "students" who have not taken a class with a given professor (or who may not even be enrolled in the college/university)? These issues may be lessened if there are multiple reviews of a given professor, but not entirely.
 
  • Like
Likes JoshGuthrie

1. What is the difference between knowledge and belief?

Knowledge refers to information or understanding that is considered to be true and supported by evidence or reasoning. Belief, on the other hand, refers to accepting something as true without necessarily having evidence or proof. In philosophy, knowledge is often seen as a stronger and more reliable form of understanding compared to belief.

2. How do philosophers define reality?

There is no single definition of reality in philosophy, as it is a complex and debated concept. Generally, philosophers view reality as the state of things as they actually exist, independent of our perceptions or beliefs about them. Some argue that reality is objective and exists independently of human perception, while others argue that it is subjective and shaped by our perceptions and experiences.

3. What is the difference between deductive and inductive reasoning?

Deductive reasoning is a logical process in which a conclusion is drawn from a set of premises that are assumed to be true. The conclusion must necessarily follow from the premises if they are true. Inductive reasoning, on the other hand, involves making generalizations or predictions based on observations or evidence. The conclusion is not necessarily certain, but rather is considered probable or likely.

4. How does philosophy relate to practical logic?

Philosophy and practical logic are closely related in that both involve critical thinking and reasoning skills. Philosophy often uses practical logic to analyze and evaluate arguments and ideas, while practical logic draws on philosophical principles to guide decision making and problem solving. Both fields aim to help individuals think more clearly and make sound judgments.

5. What are some common fallacies in reasoning and how can they be avoided?

A fallacy is an error in reasoning that can lead to an invalid or unsound argument. Some common fallacies include ad hominem attacks, where the person making the argument is attacked instead of the argument itself, and straw man arguments, where a misrepresented or exaggerated version of an opposing argument is attacked. These fallacies can be avoided by carefully examining and evaluating arguments and avoiding personal attacks or misrepresentations.

Similar threads

  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
14
Views
623
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
4
Views
810
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
2
Views
749
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top