Introduction to Modern Astrophysics -- What are the prerequisites?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the prerequisites for understanding a recommended physics textbook, specifically Carroll and Ostlie, which is considered suitable for upper undergraduate or lower graduate levels. The individual seeking advice has no formal math training but has self-studied calculus up to a level below multivariable and has explored classical mechanics and special relativity. They are currently working through a calculus book by Michael Spivak and a linear algebra book by Sheldon Axler, albeit at a slow pace. The individual expresses a desire to focus on physics and learn the necessary math as it becomes relevant, indicating a preference for a more integrated approach to learning rather than a purely mathematical foundation before tackling physics concepts.
JLowe
Messages
105
Reaction score
80
I was recently recommended this book and told it was a standard textbook at an upper undergraduate level or lower graduate level. Well that's certainly above my level, but specifically what would be the prerequisites?

I've no formal math training but self taught calculus at a level somewhere below multivariable. I've previously gone through some basic textbooks on classical mechanics and special relativity. My current math studies are ongoing with a Calculus book by Michael Spivak and a Linear Algebra book by Sheldon Axler. I'm not setting any speedrun records through either, and I'd rather start going straight to the physics and learning the math as it becomes relevant.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Back
Top