Introduction to Proofs: One-to-One and Onto Problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the relationship between one-to-one (injective) and onto (surjective) functions, specifically proving that the inverse function f-1 is one-to-one if and only if the original function f is onto. Participants clarify that for f-1(Y1) = f-1(Y2) to hold, it is essential to show both Y1 ⊆ Y2 and Y2 ⊆ Y1, leveraging the property that f is onto to ensure non-empty subsets. The proof requires understanding the implications of injectivity and surjectivity in the context of function inverses.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of functions and their properties, specifically injectivity and surjectivity.
  • Familiarity with inverse functions and their notation, such as f-1.
  • Knowledge of set theory, particularly subsets and their relationships.
  • Experience with proof techniques, including proof by contradiction.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of injective and surjective functions in detail.
  • Learn about the implications of function inverses in set theory.
  • Explore proof techniques, particularly proof by contradiction and direct proof methods.
  • Investigate the concept of pre-images in the context of functions and their inverses.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, computer scientists, and students studying advanced mathematics, particularly those focusing on functions, set theory, and proof techniques.

rdr3
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
1. Given: Let f: X → Y be a function. Then we have an associated function f-1: P(Y) → P(X), where f-1 (B)⊂X is the inverse image of B⊂Y.

Question: Show that f^(-1) is one-to-one if and only if f is onto.

[Notes: ⊂ represents subspace, I just couldn’t find a way to put the line under the symbol.
f-1 indicates the inverse of f.]



2. Ok so I know that One-to-one means we have f(x1)=f(x2), thus giving us x1=x2. And onto is ∀y∈Y, ∃x : f(x)=y.



3. What I did was just say that f-1(y1)=f-1(y2)=x thus giving me y1=y2. Or I tried proving it the other way by way of Contradiction. Saying that if f-1(y1)=f-1(y2)=x, but y1≠y2. Then we would get f(x)=y1 and f(x)=y2 but y1≠y2, thus making it not a function. So that's what I was able to come up with.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the domain of f-1 isn't the elements of Y, it's the subsets of Y.

it's not enough just to prove that f-1 is injective on singleton sets, without extending this to every subset of Y.

what you want to do is something like this:

suppose f-1(Y1) = f-1(Y2),

for Y1,Y2 ⊆ Y.

let y1 be an element of Y1.

then if x1 is in f-1(y1), x1 is in f-1(Y1), (since f(x1) = y1, which is in Y1). <--the fact that f is onto used HERE (see below).

but f-1(Y1) = f-1(Y2),

so x1 is in f-1(Y2), so y1 = f(x1) is in Y2.

thus Y1 ⊆ Y2.

(you should now show that likewise, Y2 ⊆ Y1).

there's one more subtle point to observe: we need to know that f-1(Y1) is non-empty for any non-empty subset Y1 of Y (so that our x1 in the proof actually exists).

this is where the fact that f is onto comes into play, if y is ANY element of Y (including those y1 that live in Y1) then there exists x in f-1(y),
which is a subset of f-1(Y).

so if Y1 is non-empty, f-1(Y1) is non-empty (it contains at least one element that is a pre-image of at least one element of Y1).
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K